Politics 🤡 Donald Trump

[Noitall]

Also if my eyes deceive me, thats not the same zoomed in image on the bottom right. Top right has hair going over his ear, bottom right does not.

Bit of dry skin just under the hair in the sideburn area on the May 2025 close up one. Could be from the gunshot? Might have forgotten to moisturise too

 

[Noitall]

Stuff

www.stuff.co.nz

Trump and musk at it again

 

[MrFrankWhite]

I don’t profess to have sufficient knowledge of American law to know whether these cases are being decided on the basis of the law or whether the law is being rewritten to accommodate Trump.

Vance’s analysis goes some way to clarifying that

Yes I know that she is a Democrat

Yes I know she was appoint to the bench by Obama

I’m happy to consider any analysis that you care to post

The analysis of a majority supreme court decision?

Im not discounting your source at all, but it does highlight why I wouldn't go out of my way to read her dissertations. The same way I wouldnt post the opinion piece of a right wing pro Russian polish infosec analyst.

But that doesnt mean I'm not interested in why your opinions on the topic and despite what you may think, I am interested in differing ideologies, but I prefer to have the discussion with the person rather than get given an academic reading assignment.

 

[MrFrankWhite]

Bit of dry skin just under the hair in the sideburn area on the May 2025 close up one. Could be from the gunshot? Might have forgotten to moisturise too

The image has to be discounted once you discover a deception. You already know its being provided to fool you, it cant then be relied on.

 

[Bay39er]

The analysis of a majority supreme court decision?

Im not discounting your source at all, but it does highlight why I wouldn't go out of my way to read her dissertations. The same way I wouldnt post the opinion piece of a right wing pro Russian polish infosec analyst.

But that doesnt mean I'm not interested in why your opinions on the topic and despite what you may think, I am interested in differing ideologies, but I prefer to have the discussion with the person rather than get given an academic reading assignment.

WTF are you talking about?

The post had nothing to do with “the analysis of a majority Supreme Court decision”

End of conversation