Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

NZWarriors.com

Had a really interesting discussion last night with a person who actually made Chlöe look like a poster child for Atlas with some of his views... especially on house ownership and renting.

In his view, I am putting the renters of my rental property into a live full of servitude by having them rent our property.

Firstly, we've had three lots of tenants since we owned the property with the first leaving us with $5,000 of repairs after they skipped off to Oz in the middle of the night without giving notice. The second tenants moved out after they had brought their own first home for a lot less than the value of the place they were renting from us and shifted down to Huntly.... so much for a life of servitude we'd condemned them too.

And, yes, the current tenants could afford to buy the place we are currently renting to them and have their mortgage repayments the same as what we charge them in rent.... but only after they had saved a deposit worth 54% of the value of the property.

The rent we charge them each less what they would need to allow for insurance (can't get a mortgage without it), rates and maintenance/repairs. Why? Because as the landlord, we currently pay for these things. Those "costs" for owning the property would become their responsibility.

So, here's the rough figures...

Current rent PW = $650.00
Less rates per week = $80.00
Less insurance per week = $45.00
Less maintenance per week = $55.00 (based on last year's repairs and maintenance costs)

Gives $470 PW left over for the mortgage without requiring additional finance above what they currently pay in rent to own the property.

Given the house has an approximate value of $850,000, using the BNZ's trusty mortgage calculator, that would allow them a mortgage of $390,000 and a deposit of $460,000. So, yes, the tenants could own the house for the same as they're renting it, if they could get that sized deposit together.

1764891746055.webp
 

NZWarriors.com

NZWarriors.com




Think the public is really struggling with these types of ridiculous costs while a majority are really struggling. Think many realise there’s a cost to make an impression but these just seem over the top
 

NZWarriors.com

Had a really interesting discussion last night with a person who actually made Chlöe look like a poster child for Atlas with some of his views... especially on house ownership and renting.

In his view, I am putting the renters of my rental property into a live full of servitude by having them rent our property.

Firstly, we've had three lots of tenants since we owned the property with the first leaving us with $5,000 of repairs after they skipped off to Oz in the middle of the night without giving notice. The second tenants moved out after they had brought their own first home for a lot less than the value of the place they were renting from us and shifted down to Huntly.... so much for a life of servitude we'd condemned them too.

And, yes, the current tenants could afford to buy the place we are currently renting to them and have their mortgage repayments the same as what we charge them in rent.... but only after they had saved a deposit worth 54% of the value of the property.

The rent we charge them each less what they would need to allow for insurance (can't get a mortgage without it), rates and maintenance/repairs. Why? Because as the landlord, we currently pay for these things. Those "costs" for owning the property would become their responsibility.

So, here's the rough figures...

Current rent PW = $650.00
Less rates per week = $80.00
Less insurance per week = $45.00
Less maintenance per week = $55.00 (based on last year's repairs and maintenance costs)

Gives $470 PW left over for the mortgage without requiring additional finance above what they currently pay in rent to own the property.

Given the house has an approximate value of $850,000, using the BNZ's trusty mortgage calculator, that would allow them a mortgage of $390,000 and a deposit of $460,000. So, yes, the tenants could own the house for the same as they're renting it, if they could get that sized deposit together.

View attachment 15084
I enjoyed the conversation last night Mike, great catching up
 

NZWarriors.com

I thought the true measure of a society was how it treats it's most vulnerable.
It is. But that's a different conversation to what constitutes "poor" and "inequality" which are relative terms. Absolute poverty have basically been eradicated in Australia and NZ, and thats left is relative envy.
Not simping for evil billionaires with monocles are you?
God, you dont believe the Fixed Pie Fallacy do you? Thought you were smarter than that. Please let me know what makes Taylor Swift evil and how her billion makes you poor...
 

NZWarriors.com

NZWarriors.com

Back
Top Bottom