Hit job? Are you ok? You do know she has been convicted of several instances of shop lifting? Right? Sorry, I meant correct?The hit job from the nz toxic far right in the form of Leo Molloy
Ghahraman’s $150 shopping incident: Pak’nSave never complained so how did cops find out?
Police wanted Golriz Ghahraman's new alleged shoplifting claim in her High Court appeal.www.nzherald.co.nz
Yes.
Fact: Reduce the speed limit to zero and we will have no accidents.Facts win out over far right culture war:
UK’s 20mph speed limits ‘are cutting car insurance costs’
Controversial safety policy has helped drive down premiums to 18-month low, says Confused.comwww.theguardian.com
In your opinion.Small reminder about neoliberalism and the agenda this government is following:
From Noam Chomsky in 2011
View attachment 10864
The State-Corporate Complex: A Threat to Freedom and Survival
The Noam Chomsky Website.chomsky.info
Lower premiums are good for everyone though, £995 a year for comprehensive cover is a lot more than we're paying in NZ
A small drop after premiums had risen rapidly, some had doubled. And getting better premiums when switching companies. Sounds like competition for customers is a high driver of getting lower premiums.
Nope. Fact.
Facts win out over far right culture war:
UK’s 20mph speed limits ‘are cutting car insurance costs’
Controversial safety policy has helped drive down premiums to 18-month low, says Confused.com
I've said that many times before Frank - it's your mates on here who have argued against that in the past.
"facts" yes crashing at 20mph causes less damage than crashing at 30mph. Did you just work this out? Ergo the smartest thing to do would be to make the speed limit 1mph right? right?!?
Not that point they havent, or I would have called them an idiot. Insurance data is a aggregated. Theres no evidence the number of crashes has decreased, simply the payout $$.
Nope. It's your opinion. The fact you can't see the difference says it all really.
In your opinion.
Yes, in my opinion it says a lot. It is fact that you haven't been able to differentiate between what you are trying to claim as fact and your opinion. Your posts just previously are evidence of that fact.
Aren't facts just the generally agreed opinion?
Thanks for confirming it's just his opinion. Now we agree on that, it must be fact. ,
