wizard of Tauranga
π
- Thread starter
- #8,021
Donβt like the gang ban. Next they will be coming for the Boy Scouts with all their patches!
Politics π³οΈ NZ Politics
- Thread starter wizard of Tauranga
- Start date
It's not them coming for the boy scouts mate, it's not drag queens either. We all know who it is, the ones who don't pay any tax.
@marv. I don't know any mΔori who don't see Tamaki as a dangerous parasite grifting off our most vulnerable, as this kuia says, come and get your people.
Last edited:
wizard of Tauranga
π
Source! -Bruce
marv.
ποΈ
ah shit sorry bro, i donβt have facebook to be able to see that.@marv. I don't know any Maori who don't see Tamaki as a dangerous parasite grifting off our most vulnerable, as this kuia
i didnβt mean to suggest tamaki represents anyone but himself, he has a grip of hapless followers that will happily bully trans kids/ do burnouts on their big scary m.bikes, paint over rainbow crossings, give their kids lunch money to the church and be generally menacing/bullying βchildren of godβ.
worth it though i guess if youβre seeking eternal fuckwitdom.
She's just calling on whanau of destiny members to come bring them home, they're staunching out the locals, standing over women and general thuggish fuckwittery.
Last edited:
Noitall
π€
Of course not. Mark Hosking works there
Hey, I know at least probably 20 plus and I havenβt lived in NZ for 16 years.@marv. I don't know any Maori who don't see Tamaki as a dangerous parasite grifting off our most vulnerable, as this kuia says, come and get your people.
More I think of it speculating hundreds if not thousands in their congregations.
Not a member at all just saying what I see
1722 members according to the census, could be more. Yeah I don't know any, don't doubt you though.
Nah for sure, I personally know several but they apart of congregations in Wellington, lower north island but I have no idea how big.
snake77
π‘οΈ
A friend from school is deep in the Destiny Church. By all accounts it has been good for him. If their Man-UP sessions stop men from beating their wives then that is a positive.
I have joked in the past that my friend might be there for financial advice as he's posted how due to the help of his pastor he now has a housing portfolio of x number of houses.
I'm not a fan of when he has posted showing their love and Tamaki is standing in a floor fill of cash people have thrown up there. I get that there would be a positive for a lot of them attending. Just there would be quite a few that it would be causing a financial strain on.
Then you have Tamaki living a lavish life style.
I have joked in the past that my friend might be there for financial advice as he's posted how due to the help of his pastor he now has a housing portfolio of x number of houses.
I'm not a fan of when he has posted showing their love and Tamaki is standing in a floor fill of cash people have thrown up there. I get that there would be a positive for a lot of them attending. Just there would be quite a few that it would be causing a financial strain on.
Then you have Tamaki living a lavish life style.
wizard of Tauranga
π
- Thread starter
- #8,034
If the donation/ money is an issue isnβt that the same with most churches and tithing?
Isnβt tithing just a form of tax that is used to support the church community?
If we have an issue with tithing, we must have an issue with government taxes and be pro Nationals tax cuts!
Destinyβs tithing seems to have benefitted Tamaki but isnβt he the same as most politician getting rich for being our leaders? And as a private church isnβt that the members problem?
Just because you donβt see Luxon or Jacinda on a Harley doesnβt mean they donβt earn more than Tamaki
Busting the myth that National are good economy managers - utterly reckless, utterly corrupt
From Bernard Hickey this morning
From Bernard Hickey this morning
wizard of Tauranga
π
- Thread starter
- #8,036
Yawn⦠it was a key election pledge.
If nothing else this govt has been consistent on delivering exactly what itβs promised and the left has complained the whole way.
When the left default is to complain about everything that message just gets lost in the negativity and comes across as sour grapes.
Delivery on policy should be the expectation not a shock
kiwibuild airport light rail road to zero 3 waters
tax cutsRefreshing isnβt it!
Last edited:
miket12
ποΈ
Different election cycleβ¦.. same old crap.
Back in 2017, the right were attacking the new Labour led government for not delivering anything substantial within the first six months and spending most of the time repelling acts and policies put in place by the previous National government
Go forward six yearsβ¦.. same crapβ¦. Different players. National getting attacked by the left for not delivering anything substantial within the first six months.
Same arguments against the governmentβ¦ same Defence said of the governmentβ¦. just different sides attacking and different sides defending.
Why? Because the previous government announced a Budget earlier in the election year and thatβs the money the departments have to work with. Until the first budget is announced, big spending projects canβt be fully implemented.
And, in just under three or six years time, National will be attacking a new Labour led government for non delivery within the first six months as the new government struggles to implement itβs policies under a National budget.
Like I saidβ¦.. same old crapβ¦. Just one team has the ball and the other team has to wait at least three more years until it gets another turn.
TBH, the whole thing is just boring!!!!
Back in 2017, the right were attacking the new Labour led government for not delivering anything substantial within the first six months and spending most of the time repelling acts and policies put in place by the previous National government
Go forward six yearsβ¦.. same crapβ¦. Different players. National getting attacked by the left for not delivering anything substantial within the first six months.
Same arguments against the governmentβ¦ same Defence said of the governmentβ¦. just different sides attacking and different sides defending.
Why? Because the previous government announced a Budget earlier in the election year and thatβs the money the departments have to work with. Until the first budget is announced, big spending projects canβt be fully implemented.
And, in just under three or six years time, National will be attacking a new Labour led government for non delivery within the first six months as the new government struggles to implement itβs policies under a National budget.
Like I saidβ¦.. same old crapβ¦. Just one team has the ball and the other team has to wait at least three more years until it gets another turn.
TBH, the whole thing is just boring!!!!
snake77
π‘οΈ
Saying one party is better with the economy than another while pointing out one iteration of that party. It is the same as saying Labour is bad for the economy due to the last Labour government. Where Helen Clark and Michael Cullen were totally different in terms of managing the economy.
Each party inherits different conditions from the last party or from the global situation.
Robertson had a huge financial hole in his figures when they came in as well.
For statements like one party being better than another it would require long term trends. Even then it would probably need to account for what they inherited and global situations.
Funnily enough I agree (not sure about the Robertson thing, I haven't read up on that) - but there exists the myth that National are better economic managers, which is why I mentioned it.
New Zealand can't afford tax cuts. And the said cuts benefit the well off more than anyone.
We certainly can't borrow to make them happen.
That's incredibly bad economic management.
But it's not the same old crap. This is the most extreme far right, ideologically driven government since the fourth Labour neoliberal betrayal in the 80s.
This lot are spiteful too
View: https://twitter.com/vebatevic/status/1773214917849485625
