The centre-right only ever deal in factsAny evidence of the sucking?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thread centers on New Zealand's upcoming election, primarily debating the economic management and policy differences between the center-left Labour government and center-right National/ACT opposition. Key criticisms target Labour's fiscal stewardship, citing ballooning government expenditure #7#272, housing unaffordability, and unfulfilled promises like KiwiBuild and dental care expansion #16#12. A user #7 highlighted Labour's annual 9% spending growth versus 1.5% under previous governments, arguing this fueled inflation. National's tax-cut policy faced scrutiny over funding gaps and legality, with user #215 questioning Luxon's reliance on "trust me" assurances.
Leadership competence emerged as a critical theme, particularly in later posts. Luxon drew heavy criticism after a contentious interview where he struggled to defend policy details #194#199#211, while Willis faced backlash for her economic credentials. Hipkins garnered fleeting praise for articulation but was ultimately seen as representing poor governmental outcomes #45#119. A trusted user #308 presented expert economic analysis contradicting Treasury optimism. Infrastructure issues—like Wellington's water crisis and the dental school staffing shortage—were cited as examples of systemic mismanagement #235#12. Notable policy debates included road-user charges for EVs #220, immigration impacts on rents #299, and coalition scenarios involving NZ First #182#258. Early fringe discussions on candidates' rugby allegiances gave way to substantive policy critiques, culminating in grim Treasury forecasts discussed in posts #271#304#308. User #168 also revealed concerns about Labour rushing regulatory changes to entrench policies pre-election.
Economic Policies, Housing Crisis, Leadership Competence
The centre-right only ever deal in factsAny evidence of the sucking?
ahhh let's be honest, we've all been guilty of doing that from time to time.Uhh wasnt that the mayor getting drunk and sucking off men in bar toilets?
If Jesus was born of a virgin, does that mean he had no male chromosomes?ahhh let's be honest, we've all been guilty of doing that from time to time.
as Santa once said "let he who is without sin, cast the first pebble"
I hope you charged at least. Sounds like basketball diariesahhh let's be honest, we've all been guilty of doing that from time to time.
as Santa once said "let he who is without sin, cast the first pebble"
There was a twist to this I’m trying to remember that I saw on qi the other day. Good show on random shitIf Jesus was born of a virgin, does that mean he has no male chromosomes?
5 bucks is 5 bucksI hope you charged at least. Sounds like basketball diaries
Enough to buy some breath mints at least5 bucks is 5 bucks
And Clinton's words were actuallyahhh let's be honest, we've all been guilty of doing that from time to time.
as Santa once said "let he who is without sin, cast the first pebble"
I mean she could sue for defamation couldn't she? Pretty slam dunk case.. if of course you haven't been fellating strange men in toiletsAny evidence of the sucking?
How do you know they were strange?I mean she could sue for defamation couldn't she? Pretty slam dunk case.. if of course you haven't been fellating strange men in toilets
NZ pays out on defamation all the time. Chantelle Baker is literally going through one now. You can say anything you want in private verbal comms, outside that good luckHow do you know they were strange?
Dont know if she'd have a case, it our defamation laws are anything like the French courts you can say anything about anyone if you claim you believed it in good faith at the time.
Looks like a nerd to me, what are you suggesting?Also if the back drop is that guys room, police need to have a look at his hard drive.
![]()
That infantilized middle aged men are over represented in the sexual offenders category and to a larger degree "Disney adults" (infantilized adults) are responsible for a huge subset of problems.Looks like a nerd to me, what are you suggesting?
That bunt should be strung up too.Apparently she wanted to learn saxophone but Clinton had some unique teaching methods
View attachment 13736
You think that guy is the problem when all of our institutions are corrupted with compromised rapists and paedos at the very top?That infantilized middle aged men are over represented in the sexual offenders category and to a larger degree "Disney adults" (infantilized adults) are responsible for a huge subset of problems.
Where did I say immediately cease all serious police to focus on Disney adults?You think that guy is the problem when all of our institutions are corrupted with compromised rapists and paedos at the very top?
There was once upon a time that that was about the lowest you could accuse a male of without any evidence and in my view it still is. Think you really need to look at yourself if you’re leanings or persuasion in any political scene drives you spout such things. Ironic thing is you’ve done exactly what the guy says in trying to discredit by making allegations without evidence and you’ve done it with him, the Mayor of Wellington and over on the trump thread. Disappointing FrankThat infantilized middle aged men are over represented in the sexual offenders category and to a larger degree "Disney adults" (infantilized adults) are responsible for a huge subset of problems.
Are you all over this Epstein case? What's your assessment at this point, is it intel agencies honeypotting the megarich and influential?Where did I say immediately cease all serious police to focus on Disney adults?
Unless you’re saying give minor sex offenders a pass?
100%Are you all over this Epstein case? What's your assessment at this point, is it intel agencies honeypotting the megarich and influential?
Make an off hand joke about a creepy weirdo with plushie toys in his room ≠ serious allegations of sexual offending. Unlike the mayors fellatingThere was once upon a time that that was about the lowest you could accuse a male of without any evidence and in my view it still is. Think you really need to look at yourself if you’re leanings or persuasion in any political scene drives you spout such things. Ironic thing is you’ve done exactly what the guy says in trying to discredit by making allegations without evidence and you’ve done it with him, the Mayor of Wellington and over on the trump thread. Disappointing Frank