Politics šŸ¤” Donald Trump

NZWarriors.com

Absolutely brilliant to see. The normally mild mannered Amy Coney Barrett, who wrote that Opinion of the Court, absolutely eviscerated ā€œJusticeā€ Ketanji Brown Jack-son. Jack-son was, fairly obviously, a DEI pick. In typical DEI fashion, incompetence was given responsibility way beyond ability, and that was confirmed in the Opinion, because, stunning though those words in the screenshot are, they were eclipsed by this. In the same document, after explaining some legal arguments, Amy Coney Barrett wrote "Justice Jack-son skips over that part. Because analyzing the governing statute involves boring legalese." Fark! Now *that's* a takedown.

So, one Supreme Court judge has written in a crucial judgement that another Supreme Court judge finds that the legal nitty gritty is, oh dear, just too hard for her to grasp. And five other Supreme Court judges all agreed, publicly. Wow.

But even more important than all of that was the judgement itself, in which the Supreme Court told the District Courts that they had no legal basis in their continual efforts to torpedo the Trump administration's policy making. A haymaker of a right hook knock out of the left wing activist judges. Oh yeah!!!
 
Absolutely brilliant to see. The normally mild mannered Amy Coney Barrett, who wrote that Opinion of the Court, absolutely eviscerated ā€œJusticeā€ Ketanji Brown Jack-son. Jack-son was, fairly obviously, a DEI pick. In typical DEI fashion, incompetence was given responsibility way beyond ability, and that was confirmed in the Opinion, because, stunning though those words in the screenshot are, they were eclipsed by this. In the same document, after explaining some legal arguments, Amy Coney Barrett wrote "Justice Jack-son skips over that part. Because analyzing the governing statute involves boring legalese." Fark! Now *that's* a takedown.

So, one Supreme Court judge has written in a crucial judgement that another Supreme Court judge finds that the legal nitty gritty is, oh dear, just too hard for her to grasp. And five other Supreme Court judges all agreed, publicly. Wow.

But even more important than all of that was the judgement itself, in which the Supreme Court told the District Courts that they had no legal basis in their continual efforts to torpedo the Trump administration's policy making. A haymaker of a right hook knock out of the left wing activist judges. Oh yeah!!!
We get it. You love fascism, you love authoritarianism, you love disinformation, you love the far right.
 

NZWarriors.com

    Nobody is reading this thread right now.
Back
Top Bottom