Social đź¦ą Crime.

NZWarriors.com

NZWarriors.com

Where does pedophilia sit in that? Mad or bad? Those examples I gave fall into the mad category as you mentioned, but what about the horrors from the catholic church over time, those that money can buy the horrific deeds done to child,
You cannot single out the catholic church in this respect -members of various bodies including other religions were accused in the Judicial Court of Enquiry on these perverse abuses
 
You cannot single out the catholic church in this respect -members of various bodies including other religions were accused in the Judicial Court of Enquiry on these perverse abuses
It goes to the top, British PM Edward Heath was a notorious paedophile, Jimmy Saville was a fixer and procurer of young boys and girls for the establishment. Why would NZ be any different?
 

NZWarriors.com

If someone calling themselves bussy galore has pictures of children being abused like pedo bro did, yes. Otherwise no
Huh? Normalisation doesn't equate to criminality, in fact Id argue the opposite. Pedo bro isn't trying to normalise anything, he's a degenerate who virtue signals in his community. If Ben Bussey ISNT a degenerate virtue signalling to his community, then he is in fact trying to normalise pedo shit in the general public.

You cant have your kids cake and eat it too.
 
Huh? Normalisation doesn't equate to criminality, in fact Id argue the opposite. Pedo bro isn't trying to normalise anything, he's a degenerate who virtue signals in his community. If Ben Bussey ISNT a degenerate virtue signalling to his community, then he is in fact trying to normalise pedo shit in the general public.

You cant have your kids cake and eat it too.
Huh? Your pedo bro had images of abused children, bussy galore had a child on his knee with a suggestive caption. Neither are good but the one with images of abused children far worse. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to decipher that
 

NZWarriors.com

Huh? Your pedo bro had images of abused children, bussy galore had a child on his knee with a suggestive caption. Neither are good but the one with images of abused children far worse. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to decipher that
"whats worse" wasn't the parameter now was it. It was about normalization, which your good mate Ben Bussey was trying to do. In fact comrade Chloe used the words "normal" when she was running cover for him.

Unless of course you concede he is in fact a degenerate virtue signaling to his community.
 
"whats worse" wasn't the parameter now was it. It was about normalization, which your good mate Ben Bussey was trying to do. In fact comrade Chloe used the words "normal" when she was running cover for him.

Unless of course you concede he is in fact a degenerate virtue signaling to his community.
Of course what’s worse is relevant. One is guilty of a dumb choice of words or a sick sense of humour and the other has child sex abuse images and is apart of a group that shares the images to each other. If Doyle has such images, they’re one and the same. Two different scenarios with one offending with words and the other offending by the images of abused children
 
Of course what’s worse is relevant. One is guilty of a dumb choice of words or a sick sense of humour and the other has child sex abuse images and is apart of a group that shares the images to each other. If Doyle has such images, they’re one and the same. Two different scenarios with one offending with words and the other offending by the images of abused children
If you struggle you follow the conversation, you can always click the back button and reread it.

Alarming how some are trying to normalise pedophilia with this guy calling himself pedo bro.
 

NZWarriors.com

If you struggle you follow the conversation, you can always click the back button and reread it.
You’re a perfect example trying to normalise a guy sharing child abuse images and trying to compare it to a person that you despise their community. Fairly simple to differentiate that one broke the law and the other came out with a hideous statement. One’s going to jail and the other potentially won’t be voted for
 
You’re a perfect example trying to normalise a guy sharing child abuse images and trying to compare it to a person that you despise their community. Fairly simple to differentiate that one broke the law and the other came out with a hideous statement. One’s going to jail and the other potentially won’t be voted for
Trump is doing more to normalise it than either of these two obscure cases
 

NZWarriors.com

    Nobody is reading this thread right now.
Back
Top Bottom