Am I right in assuming that the Act includes only the proposals that would suppress voting and excludes those that would expand voting?
Politics 🤡 Donald Trump
- Thread starter sup42
- Start date
I dunno, sounds like the voting legitamacy has gotten out of control and lost its way...
If you have either a US birth certificate, citizenship, residency (If those rules apply) after a certain time or proof of refugee status.. Then ok to vote... should be simple.. cant prove any of the above cant vote... watch out for ICE..
If you have either a US birth certificate, citizenship, residency (If those rules apply) after a certain time or proof of refugee status.. Then ok to vote... should be simple.. cant prove any of the above cant vote... watch out for ICE..
Noitall
👤
I can’t decipher a coherent point about congress anywhere in these text walls. Grammar was invented for a reason.
As for concerns, I’ve addressed that too. It’s fake. Social justice groups earning their donations. 83% support amongst actual people that vote.
Among the most-supported proposals:
- Requiring electronic voting machines to print a paper backup of a voter’s ballot (84% in favor)
- Requiring all voters to show government-issued photo identification (83%)
- Making early, in-person voting available for at least two weeks prior to the election (80%)
- Making Election Day a federal holiday (74%)
Most Americans Back Expanded Early Voting, Voting by Mail, Voter ID
President Donald Trump’s recent pledge to end mail-in voting comes as a 58% majority of Americans favor allowing any voter to cast their ballot by mail.www.pewresearch.org
View: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/14Tzobpb34G/?mibextid=wwXIfr
It’s these issues that address kevin’s view that the issue is it’s unconstitutional, which is why it’s so contentious at 218-213 and why they’ve probably said it will be done either way because it doesn’t actually have great support in the house where it matters
I assume this will all happen in two weeks
Utterly senseless.
bsky.app
David Ho (@davidho.bsky.social)
This author has chosen to make their posts visible only to people who are signed in.
bsky.app
Just wondering though... if above is true then why would a motion be put forward to congress on ID requirements?
Was the last election fraudulent?
I can think of no reason why this historically unpopular president would want to effectively suppress the vote
It’s over man. The Chinese ninja robots are here. (This is not AI)
View: https://x.com/tristan0x/status/2023437922150871104?s=46&t=N6rrXot3pBpvv2hdvhmStw
View: https://x.com/tristan0x/status/2023437922150871104?s=46&t=N6rrXot3pBpvv2hdvhmStw
Constitution doesn’t prohibit showing ID to vote. Supreme Court has made a few rulings on this already
Noitall
👤
As we’ve gone over this today that the tribal one is unconstitutional because of the not accepting identification without an expiry date therefore forcing people to purchase the acceptable identification who may not have the means as the chap alludes to. The numerous examples I’ve provided you about why it’s seen as an issue and you unable to provide fuck all other than your opinion as to why it’s not is a waste of my time. Thank goodness you don’t support the guy or you’d be at real pains make it seem normal to accept some photo identification and not others
So a free alternative solves your “unconstitutionality”. Also big questions as to whether or not the interpretation of govt covers Indian Tribal authorities.
Here’s some background reading. Maybe you can form an argument of your own.
By contrast, the Court upheld a statute that required voters to present a government-issued photo identification in order to vote, as the state had not required voters to pay a tax or a fee to obtain a new photo identification.
Ho Lee Fuk!
Noitall
👤
I’ve been explaining my argument all day and providing evidence of the concerns, one of these might register otherwise don’t bother
The ‘SAVE America Act’ Threatens Children’s Representation
For most of American history, democracy was not designed to include everyone.
brucelesley.substack.com
Tell the Senate to Reject the SAVE Act
Nonprofit VOTE is calling on the Us Senate to reject the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, H.R. 22
www.nonprofitvote.org
ACLU Condemns House Passage of SAVE America Act as Dangerous Assault on Democracy | American Civil Liberties Union
WASHINGTON — The U.S. House of Representatives has passed the so-called SAVE America Act, which would impose new burdensome requirements related to...
www.aclu.org
83% Want Voter ID - So Why Is Congress Fighting It? SAVE Act Explained
Throughout this episode of the Independent Voter Podcast, the central theme remains clear: Americans broadly support common-sense reforms to strengthen election integrity and government accountability, but partisan strategy and fundraising incentives continue to stall meaningful change.
ivn.us
‘Jim Crow 2.0’: Civil Rights Leaders Sound Alarm on SAVE America Act
The bill “is not about protecting our elections,” the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund says. “It’s about disguising voter suppression.”
capitalbnews.org
This is next level stuff man. I’m slightly concerned about this
Cool so in your own words, sum up how the US Supreme Court got their decision wrong in Crawford v. Marion County Election BoardI’ve been explaining my argument all day and providing evidence of the concerns, one of these might register otherwise don’t bother
The ‘SAVE America Act’ Threatens Children’s Representation
For most of American history, democracy was not designed to include everyone.
Tell the Senate to Reject the SAVE Act
Nonprofit VOTE is calling on the Us Senate to reject the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, H.R. 22
ACLU Condemns House Passage of SAVE America Act as Dangerous Assault on Democracy | American Civil Liberties Union
WASHINGTON — The U.S. House of Representatives has passed the so-called SAVE America Act, which would impose new burdensome requirements related to...
83% Want Voter ID - So Why Is Congress Fighting It? SAVE Act Explained
Throughout this episode of the Independent Voter Podcast, the central theme remains clear: Americans broadly support common-sense reforms to strengthen election integrity and government accountability, but partisan strategy and fundraising incentives continue to stall meaningful change.ivn.us
‘Jim Crow 2.0’: Civil Rights Leaders Sound Alarm on SAVE America Act
The bill “is not about protecting our elections,” the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund says. “It’s about disguising voter suppression.”
Or alternatively tell me how it doesn’t apply here.
Noitall
👤
I’m not debating that there is an appetite for it America, as this stanza points out in this article that it’s a 80/20 issue and it’s already the case in 36 states, but just like practically everything it needs to approached in a bipartisan manner with both involved when it comes to elections
83% Want Voter ID - So Why Is Congress Fighting It? SAVE Act Explained
Throughout this episode of the Independent Voter Podcast, the central theme remains clear: Americans broadly support common-sense reforms to strengthen election integrity and government accountability, but partisan strategy and fundraising incentives continue to stall meaningful change.
ivn.us
We talk about the bipartisan public support for banning members of Congress from trading individual stocks, while criticizing partisan gridlock that prevents reform from reaching a floor vote. Polling shows this is an 80-20 issue just like voter ID requirements – another issue muddled by partisan politics
- Thread starter
- #8,820
Yeah well you mocked my position that NZ needs to dump the U.S and go all in with China. It is very clear that one super power is winning and that the other is destroying itself internally and doesn't give a fk about us. The Game now is who takes an early position in the Asia Pacific sphere with a seat at the table and not a hall pass to sit outside the big room and kiss China's ass while being made to wait. The Cook Islands were smarter than us.