I honestly don't think you can call him one way or the other.... just deranged and dangerous.
Someone on the right doesn't legislate to prevent companies buying mortgagee/forced sales.... they'd encourage that in the name of "free enterprise".
Politics 🤡 Donald Trump
- Thread starter sup42
- Start date
Someone on the right doesn't legislate to prevent companies buying mortgagee/forced sales.... they'd encourage that in the name of "free enterprise".
NZWarriors.com
You need to stop relying on AI
and start relying on the far right social media algorithm !
I also wouldn't plan on visiting Trumpland anytime soon either if I was you.
Actually, based on my post above this (calling Trump derange) neither should I!!!
NZWarriors.com
I wonder how the people who love to virtue signal about American tax dollars feel about this?
@Tokyo Warrior nothing more disingenuous than hiding retarded questions you had to ask AI to get the answer you want.
Why not ask it if illegal immigrants add to housing demand? Add to healthcare demand? Or if additional labour supply decreases wages?
Ohh we know why
Why not ask it if illegal immigrants add to housing demand? Add to healthcare demand? Or if additional labour supply decreases wages?
Ohh we know why
NZWarriors.com
Frank. You clearly live and thrive on bigotry, hatred, racism, lies and disinformation.
How does it benefit you to keep posting your bullshit? Given how you treat people. And the lies you look to entrench.
Presumably you know that you're not going to convince anyone of anything you post apart from your mates.
So apart from rampant narcissism, what do you have left?
NZWarriors.com
Yesterday you compared immigrants to slaves, but as we know slavery is forced labour or forced conditions. There’s no doubt that wages are likely low, with agriculture and construction being two areas I know that are highly represented by immigrant workers but the people are doing it willingly so slavery isn’t able to be attached to this as they aren’t being forced. If comparing it to slavery in terms of wages, the point stands, what Americans are going to fill these jobs at the same rate? Is extra money going to magically appear to pay higher wages to attract?
It gives people two seconds to enjoy noem punted until you learn more on this peckerhead
The lady that shot her 14 month old dog that she trained poorly? So many DEI hires these days
NZWarriors.com
He was obviously identified as the correct character to really stir things up to be heading into retirement, I get the impression the approach is going to be to have gone in hard like they have to pave the way for people to be more accepting of what’s happening so long as the murders aren’t going with it like we’ve seen? We know aggressive is how this guy goes in his art of the deal mantra so it’ll be interesting to see what comes next?
NZWarriors.com
I copy and paste your words into the search bar and make it into a question. Any retardation comes from the source. I will make sure to include the question from now on.
We actually enjoy visiting Guam, but FX rates have made that untenable. Oh well!
This was covered in my answer above. Yes, they add to demand at the lower end, but demand isn’t the main factor spiking prices in that market.
NZWarriors.com
And I freely admit that undocumented immigrants tend to have jobs of some kind. I think it was described above as a complementary situation of taking on low-skilled jobs which are otherwise difficult to fill. Have a good day!
While Frank licks his wounds; I'd like to interject with some Govt bond/debt chat.
There was discussion earlier about California’s state debt. That is real debt, like our own council’s debt. Cali uses US dollars but cannot create them. It must collect taxes or borrow (via state bonds) to accommodate spending. Like you or I with a mortgage, that debt must be repaid from future income. That’s the constraint.
Conflating this with US federal debt, or with China’s bond holdings, misses the point. Sovereign Govt debt works differently.
When a sovereign Govt (NZ, US, China, Australia, UK, Japan, Canada, etc.) issues bonds in its own currency, it does not borrow like a household, a business, Cali, or Auckland Council to fund spending. Bond issuance is part of central bank operations to manage base money liquidity and control interest rates.
Sovereign Govts create new digital money when they spend. The central bank credits bank accounts for every Govt payment: wages, pensions, benefits, healthcare, education, infrastructure, contracts. The money is created at the moment of spending.
Govt bonds are an asset swap. The Govt exchanges interest-bearing IOUs (bonds/treasuries) for excess reserves in the banking system created by prior Govt spending. Spending happens first. Bond issuance follows. The Govt is not waiting for tax revenue or “borrowing” in order to spend.
NZ, the US, China, the UK, Japan, Australia and Canada – each issues bonds in its own currency.
None can run out of the currency they create.
Govt bonds issued in a sovereign currency are considered risk-free in the technical sense – meaning they carry no default risk, not that they are free from price or interest-rate risk.
The issuer controls the currency in which the bond obligation is created and can always ensure settlement at maturity. That’s an operational fact, not a political claim.
Bonds are fixed-term assets. If China sells US Treasuries, it sells them on the secondary market. The US Govt is not involved. This does not materially affect the US Govt’s ability to spend US dollars.
Physical cash can cross borders, but physical cash is a tiny fraction of modern money. Most money exists as digital balances within banking systems. China’s bond holdings are claims recorded within the US financial system.
When China sells those bonds, it sells them to whoever wants to buy them – banks, pension funds, or other institutions. China receives US dollars. The buyer receives the bond. The US Govt is not part of that transaction. The assets simply change hands within the same system.
Sovereign Govts do not owe their spending power to external players*. Bonds are denominated in the currency the Govt itself issues. The central bank can always purchase bonds if needed. In consolidated terms, the state’s liabilities are recorded within its own central bank accounting framework.
Flipping this around, what we call “national debt” is more accurately private sector savings (that's us!). For the Govt it is an accounting entry; for the private sector it is a financial asset. Every dollar of Govt debt is a dollar someone else holds. Should we talk about how that debt is accumulated and distributed? Absolutely – but that’s a different discussion.
Govts are currency issuers.** They face real 'resource' constraints: workers, materials, energy, and productive capacity.
Everyone else is a currency user. We face financial constraints.
Confusing the two creates fear about problems that do not exist.
* Unless a Govt borrows in foreign currency, in which case it does cede monetary sovereignty for that portion of debt.
** Banks also create money, but through lending. Different mechanics.
$38 trillion in US federal debt is not debt like you or I have. This is where people get tripped up. Even politicians, financial experts, and economists often treat sovereign Govt debt like a household mortgage or loan obligation. It is not, and I’ll break down why.
There was discussion earlier about California’s state debt. That is real debt, like our own council’s debt. Cali uses US dollars but cannot create them. It must collect taxes or borrow (via state bonds) to accommodate spending. Like you or I with a mortgage, that debt must be repaid from future income. That’s the constraint.
Conflating this with US federal debt, or with China’s bond holdings, misses the point. Sovereign Govt debt works differently.
When a sovereign Govt (NZ, US, China, Australia, UK, Japan, Canada, etc.) issues bonds in its own currency, it does not borrow like a household, a business, Cali, or Auckland Council to fund spending. Bond issuance is part of central bank operations to manage base money liquidity and control interest rates.
Sovereign Govts create new digital money when they spend. The central bank credits bank accounts for every Govt payment: wages, pensions, benefits, healthcare, education, infrastructure, contracts. The money is created at the moment of spending.
Govt bonds are an asset swap. The Govt exchanges interest-bearing IOUs (bonds/treasuries) for excess reserves in the banking system created by prior Govt spending. Spending happens first. Bond issuance follows. The Govt is not waiting for tax revenue or “borrowing” in order to spend.
NZ, the US, China, the UK, Japan, Australia and Canada – each issues bonds in its own currency.
None can run out of the currency they create.
Govt bonds issued in a sovereign currency are considered risk-free in the technical sense – meaning they carry no default risk, not that they are free from price or interest-rate risk.
The issuer controls the currency in which the bond obligation is created and can always ensure settlement at maturity. That’s an operational fact, not a political claim.
No.
Bonds are fixed-term assets. If China sells US Treasuries, it sells them on the secondary market. The US Govt is not involved. This does not materially affect the US Govt’s ability to spend US dollars.
Physical cash can cross borders, but physical cash is a tiny fraction of modern money. Most money exists as digital balances within banking systems. China’s bond holdings are claims recorded within the US financial system.
When China sells those bonds, it sells them to whoever wants to buy them – banks, pension funds, or other institutions. China receives US dollars. The buyer receives the bond. The US Govt is not part of that transaction. The assets simply change hands within the same system.
Sovereign Govts do not owe their spending power to external players*. Bonds are denominated in the currency the Govt itself issues. The central bank can always purchase bonds if needed. In consolidated terms, the state’s liabilities are recorded within its own central bank accounting framework.
Flipping this around, what we call “national debt” is more accurately private sector savings (that's us!). For the Govt it is an accounting entry; for the private sector it is a financial asset. Every dollar of Govt debt is a dollar someone else holds. Should we talk about how that debt is accumulated and distributed? Absolutely – but that’s a different discussion.
Govts are currency issuers.** They face real 'resource' constraints: workers, materials, energy, and productive capacity.
Everyone else is a currency user. We face financial constraints.
Confusing the two creates fear about problems that do not exist.
* Unless a Govt borrows in foreign currency, in which case it does cede monetary sovereignty for that portion of debt.
** Banks also create money, but through lending. Different mechanics.
Last edited: