Well they are the aggressor and they did invade Ukraine
Current Affairs ⚔️ Ukraine - Russia War
- Thread starter sup42
- Start date
Ooh I wonder for what reason they felt they had to do that..
Ooh I wonder what conspiracy driven thinking you're deep into
When will you acknowledge that it was a pre-emptive strike by the Russians against the Ukrainians who were planning a large invasion of Russia on behalf of the aggressive and militaristic European NATO countries?
I won't mike. There’s clearly at least two lines of thinking, and one very clearly to me follows a pattern of conspiracy, the right and far right and mass disinformation.
Equally I don't know enough to say absolutely which is factually correct but you can see the grouping behind each line of thinking in these forums too, which also follows the same patterns.
I hate conspiracy driven bullshit and disinformation. Putin is not the victim here.
Okay sounds like you still believe in Russiagate..
Nope. Have a read again. I believe in facts.
We all believe in facts as we see them, it's the action and why our why it is taken that has significance.
Then there is opinion and winners and losers and yet still there will be Russia but not so much Ukraine as it was recently..
Facts are independent of you or l. Not interpretation of fact.
The earth is round. Fact. As one example.
It's was fact that the earth was flat until it was proven otherwise..
These may be Russian chat bots
If so the last word is always theirs.
Probably why you two are unable to parse new information.
“When you see something that disagrees with you, you’re more likely to attribute it to a bot than people who agree with it,” Waytz explains. And believing content was written by a bot, the study shows, “makes you discount the information”—a cycle that may contribute to further political conflict.
Is There a Bot Behind That Tweet?
When we see messages that contradict our political ideology, we are more inclined to attribute them to bots. It’s making society even more polarized.
insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu
It never crossed my mind while attempting to trigger their thought process that they might possibly actually be bots!Probably why you two are unable to parse new information.
“When you see something that disagrees with you, you’re more likely to attribute it to a bot than people who agree with it,” Waytz explains. And believing content was written by a bot, the study shows, “makes you discount the information”—a cycle that may contribute to further political conflict.
Is There a Bot Behind That Tweet?
When we see messages that contradict our political ideology, we are more inclined to attribute them to bots. It’s making society even more polarized.
If course I don't believe they are but they are continually challenging this logic and the definition of bots may well need to be broadened..
Hey thanks FrankProbably why you two are unable to parse new information.
“When you see something that disagrees with you, you’re more likely to attribute it to a bot than people who agree with it,” Waytz explains. And believing content was written by a bot, the study shows, “makes you discount the information”—a cycle that may contribute to further political conflict.
Is There a Bot Behind That Tweet?
When we see messages that contradict our political ideology, we are more inclined to attribute them to bots. It’s making society even more polarized.
Must have been cold out there at Darra this morning
You mean continually challenging lies and disinformation? Surely that's a necessity in your clearly restricted echo chamber
Last edited:
Dw he can't see you right now. Can he...?
Bot s that wtd?