Politics πŸ—³οΈ NZ Politics

No it doesn’t, again this statement completely ignores the 1940s to the 1980s.

Penalising homeownership reduces supply, moving incentives to businesses does not.
The reason being is homeownership is not solely driven by return on capital. The human need for shelter already provides a base demand.

People are already motivated to allocate time and resources into obtaining shelter. So what needs to be done is make it more attractive for people to allocate excess capital into something other than property.
Even though people must have housing (although I could counter we just over crowd and increase homelessness when supply doesn’t meet demand), if you ram disincentives and add cost, the product just becomes more expensive for the same house to be built.
 
Giving people tax incentives for rental mortgage means more investment in property.
I would counter rental properties managed as a business normally pay a higher interest rate than you and me home owners.

And the issue is business lending painful and a massive disincentive having to jump through hoops. There’s a reason many leverage their private house to fund a business.
 
Even though people must have housing (although I could counter we just over crowd and increase homelessness when supply doesn’t meet demand), if you ram disincentives and add cost, the product just becomes more expensive for the same house to be built.
Again, incentivising business investment is not penalising homeownership. Plus due to risk profiles, there will still be people diversifying into property.

If you ascribe overcrowding and homelessness to a lack of supply, what do you think will happen to price when you reduce demand?

As for "ram disincentives and add cost" these are conversations separate to the ones we are having. If I remove CGT from start up companies, what "disincentives and costs" are added to the housing market?
 
I would counter rental properties managed as a business normally pay a higher interest rate than you and me home owners.

And the issue is business lending painful and a massive disincentive having to jump through hoops. There’s a reason many leverage their private house to fund a business.
Sorry I didn't mean businesses, I mean mortgages on a house.
 
Giving people tax incentives for rental mortgage means more investment in property.
What’s the tax advantage of rental property investment?

They have to pay the same as any other businesses. Eg all businesses can claim interest as a cost. Labours interest rules were unheard of world wide and as an accounting practice.

Now property had tax disadvantages other business don’t face: bright line, ring fencing of loses.
 
What’s the tax advantage of rental property investment?

They have to pay the same as any other businesses. Eg all businesses can claim interest as a cost. Labours interest rules were unheard of world wide and as an accounting practice.

Now property had tax disadvantages other business don’t face: bright line, ring fencing of loses.
How many people does your average rental employ?
 
@Lord Gnome of Mooloolaba, one of the former heads of the CRL project, Sean Sweeney, has come out and said that he thought the project should have been delivered for half the price if design changes were made earlier. From your time doing governance and review over the project, do you think he's right?
 

cruel-or-crucial-simon-bridges-demands-urgent-clear-out-cbd-vagrants

Why can't we solve the problem rather than sweep it under the carpet?
The problem is, depending on who you talk to, you'll get a range of answers as to what is causing the problem

From my eyewitness evidence of seeing these people on a daily basis, it appears to be more of a mental health problem rather than inequality / house prices / crime. Though the usual suspects will tell you it is because house prices are too high, or that it is systemic racism (it's not - there are plenty of different colours on our streets)

Just stand near one of them on the way to work and you quickly see that a nice warm room and clean clothes won't solve anything

We do need move on orders. Auckland CBD is the shop window for international tourism and it needs to be safe and clean to be attractive for tourism.

The move on orders are a band aid though
 

cruel-or-crucial-simon-bridges-demands-urgent-clear-out-cbd-vagrants

Why can't we solve the problem rather than sweep it under the carpet?
The more money you pour into "helping the homeless" the more homeless you end up with. Its a pretty clear statistic. It turns human suffering into a profit center.

Most people don't want to hear it but the solution is asylums for the truly mentally ill and harsh sentencing for vagrant criminals
 
The more money you pour into "helping the homeless" the more homeless you end up with. Its a pretty clear statistic. It turns human suffering into a profit center.

Most people don't want to hear it but the solution is asylums for the truly mentally ill and harsh sentencing for vagrant criminals
Well nothing is happening so the status quo stays.

The problem is they aren't getting help and homelessness is getting more. Wellington 15 years ago was essentially blanket man and a couple of others. There are heaps now.
 
Well nothing is happening so the status quo stays.

The problem is they aren't getting help and homelessness is getting more. Wellington 15 years ago was essentially blanket man and a couple of others. There are heaps now.
NZ spends nearly half a billion dollars on homelessness. That number has been steadily increasing. Please look into global empirical evidence. California spent $20B on homelessness and the rate doubled. Now they are blocking audits into where the money went.

As I said, asylums and harsher sentencing for vagrant criminals. That would solve 75% of the issue, less than the 93% estimated by the US DEA
 
Yeah that's the problem. Bandaid is ok but what's the plan after?

Of course it's a complex problem but we need to do more as society to figure it out. Some help is better than no help.
Yeah I think the mental health angle needs a lot more work

I imagine a lot of these people should actually be in proper care facilities

What's my solution? I'd tidy up the ACC system and reallocate a lot of funding to mental health care facilities. ACC is leaky as f*ck, and a lot of that health money should be better spent on fixing health, rather than massages for sprains
 
Back
Top Bottom