Frank, you live in a world of lies and disinformation.
Current Affairs 🌡️ Weather / climate change
- Thread starter wizard of Tauranga
- Start date
NZWarriors.com
Why not just turn the wind up? 
theconversation.com
Almost a third of NZ households face energy hardship – reform has to go beyond cheaper off-peak power
A fifth of New Zealanders surveyed said they struggled to pay their power bills in the past year, forcing them to choose between electricity and other essentials.
theconversation.com
- Thread starter
- #423
Looks like Sydney has been paying their carbon taxes based on these high tide lines.
NZWarriors.com
Far right misinformation
How do we know the 2nd picture's not low tide
- Thread starter
- #426
Because I said the high tide mark. You can see the line of slime in both pictures.
You mean Sydney HASN’T been paying their carbon tax???
NZWarriors.com
Fuck me, call up the world's climate scientists, we have a hitherto unknown genius who's solved it! Also backed up by our resident hewhoknowseverything!
High tide mark looks higher in the bottom one. Slime almost to the top in the second one and although black and white, the top blocks look relatively clean in the top one
I think Nuclear is a big part of the answer, but I don't think big oil is the problem. Plenty of Nuclear in France. The challenges of Fusion are great. Fission is fine, but we need some leadership with the vision to go ahead with it. If we had built a 1000 MWh plant 40 years ago we would be laughing now. We allowed our distaste for Nuclear weapons to cloud our judgment on Nuclear power IMO.
NZWarriors.com
- Thread starter
- #430
I’m flattered, really. But I just look at real life pictures over possible computer modelling.
Nothing genius in that
I do think the world changing but I believe we will adapt. In another 100 years they might put another row of blocks on top of that wharf in Sydney…
- Thread starter
- #431
I don’t know, I look at the fourth step down on the stairs in the modern picture as a clear high tide mark, which is in line with the bottom of the top block which seems the high tide mark in the older photo.
Doesn’t seem much change to me but the Aussies pay a lot of carbon tax so it might not affect them as much.
No chance, you lost a true visionary in hulk hogan yesterdayI’m flattered, really. But I just look at real life pictures over possible computer modelling.
Nothing genius in that
I do think the world changing but I believe we will adapt. In another 100 years they might put another row of blocks on top of that wharf in Sydney…
NZWarriors.com
Na the water goes way higher in high tide in the bottom picture judging by the sludge line
Civilisation hasn't been around billions, millions or even thousands of years. It has been around for a very short period in a very specific climate. Which is changing rapidly.
Now THIS is science. A couple of photos someone got off Facebook which we're told represent high tides in Sydney. What was I thinking reading IPPC reports?
NZWarriors.com
Civilisation has in fact been around for thousands of years.
It's really funny reading this thread for a few reasons:
1. You've got climate change deniers imagining they're free thinking individualists by denying the "mainstream" science, when actually they're thinking very precisely what the richest people in the world have spent decades paying a lot of money to make them think. They literally could not be more obedient to power if they tried.
2. The climate change denialists have won! We're doing bugger all to reduce emissions. We WILL see somewhere between 3 and 6 degrees warming by the end of the century. And the denialists are going to keep stubbornly denying while their insurance premiums skyrocket (if they can get insurance at all), and the roads they depend on are abandoned because they can't be replaced every five years. (No need to go into the really serious consequences).
Like climate change is really bad. But a small little silver lining is watching the chickens coming home to roost for the denialists while they keep denying because who wants to admit they were played and hoodwinked?
1. You've got climate change deniers imagining they're free thinking individualists by denying the "mainstream" science, when actually they're thinking very precisely what the richest people in the world have spent decades paying a lot of money to make them think. They literally could not be more obedient to power if they tried.
2. The climate change denialists have won! We're doing bugger all to reduce emissions. We WILL see somewhere between 3 and 6 degrees warming by the end of the century. And the denialists are going to keep stubbornly denying while their insurance premiums skyrocket (if they can get insurance at all), and the roads they depend on are abandoned because they can't be replaced every five years. (No need to go into the really serious consequences).
Like climate change is really bad. But a small little silver lining is watching the chickens coming home to roost for the denialists while they keep denying because who wants to admit they were played and hoodwinked?
Omg. We've got a true conspiracist. Genuinely loopy flat earth, lizard people stuff. Out the fucken gate.
NZWarriors.com
Have you had a serious head injury? Or just generally unaware of general human history?
The Roman Empire began 2050 years ago. Civilisation yo
Cheerfully withdraw and humbly apologise. I did not mean to say even thousands, and for some reason I read what you said as hundreds of thousands. Completely wrong. Civilisation has operated under a very specific climate for several thousand years.
-
Nobody is reading this thread right now.