Yes. The exceptions are not the rule.
Zimbabwe already happened.
PS before the Caucasian racism accusations fly. I’m half African.
Politics 🤡 Donald Trump
- Thread starter sup42
- Start date
Zimbabwe already happened.
PS before the Caucasian racism accusations fly. I’m half African.
No one is accusing you of racism. Deliberately giving refugee status to only white people is a racist policy however
That may be, but is also a policy of self preservation. And that is becoming more important to some people than being labelled racist.
Self preservation of the policy makers?
Of your country
Deflection frankly
You're a conspiracist frank. I should be better than what I originally posted. In this case the second half of conspiracist stands true
So importing only white refugees is preserving the USA?
In this specific case yes. I would argue against importing Albanians and Georgians too and they are pretty white
Zimbabwe is a conspiracy theory? Are you off your meds?
White and Black farmers still bear the scars of Zimbabwe’s land grabs
How mishandling of land reform evicted many white farmers, ‘enriched elites’ and left Black Zimbabweans in poverty.
How so? What does a skilled white South African provide that an equally skilled black South African can't?
1. None. Except white farmers are skilled by default of being a farmer and that same level of skill barely exists in the black population.
2. Trumps carrying on about bringing industry back to the US. The Boers literally built a country and economy off of primary production.
Farmland restitution projects sow a costly legacy of failure
Nearly three decades after SA’s formal land claims process began in 1996, many farmland restitution projects are floundering or have collapsed, raising questions about the extent to which the billions of rands of state expenditure has benefited the claimant communities.
Have the white South Africans who Trump has welcomed had their land taken from them?
Promised land: how South Africa’s black farmers were set up to fail
The long read: After apartheid, when black people were given back their land, many felt driven to prove they could farm as well as white South Africans. But even before they had begun, the system was stacked against them
Here’s a brief explanation why few exist
Last edited:
No idea. Im sure google can tell you
I mean I agree. They lack the skills and education for both farming and governing a country. Not sure what your reading into that..Promised land: how South Africa’s black farmers were set up to fail
The long read: After apartheid, when black people were given back their land, many felt driven to prove they could farm as well as white South Africans. But even before they had begun, the system was stacked against themwww.theguardian.com
Here’s a brief explanation why few exist
...
Buys was acutely aware of white-run agriculture’s reputation, and the pressure for black farmers to produce higher yields. Yet he quickly became alarmed by the people coming to apply for previously white-owned farms. “Their business plans were way out there,” he said. The applicants envisioned immediately owning fleets of tractors, with incomes in the millions. “We would say: you are only just starting out! We would explain to them that even white farmers who have tractors and delivery vehicles and [irrigation systems] didn’t get to that level overnight.”
The applicants didn’t accept this, Buys recalled. They would retort: “This is our time. You are a black government. You are our people. You should help us get these things so we can be like the ones for whom we once worked.”
.....
The first was that, generations later, there were many more offspring than there had been original victims. And the beneficiaries – who, after a century of industrialisation, now came from diverse lines of work ranging from trucking to mining – had a far greater range of ideas regarding what should be done with the restored land than its original pastoralist occupants had ever had. Groups numbering into the hundreds were resettled on plots that had been owned by a single white family. Many quarrelled over its management, sometimes to the death.
The second, crueller problem was that the descendants of those deprived of rural land were also the least likely to have received the kind of education necessary to run a hi-tech farm in a globalised marketplace. Some couldn’t read; many hadn’t finished high school. Receiving a mechanised farm that immediately demanded the implementation of a computerised marketing plan for exporting the produce to Europe was, for these so-called beneficiaries of liberation, a little like receiving a welcome-to-your-new-country gift basket containing a screaming newborn baby.
The argument that the Boers who built everything from nothing are to blame for its collapse after they are gone, even if handed over half fucked, is left wing liberalism in its finest.
Argue all you want about Boers right to be there in the first place sure, but the ongoing collapse of SA isn't their fault now after 30 years.
Argue all you want about Boers right to be there in the first place sure, but the ongoing collapse of SA isn't their fault now after 30 years.
Are whites superior to blacks in your view? You’ve mentioned farming holding your view for this to be the case, but what about overall?
No luck. Deep Seek reckons "the narrative of widespread illegal farm seizures forcing white farmers to flee as "refugees" is largely overstated and politicized". Elon's AI says the same.
Still can't get my head around how you think a white only policy, which would exclude you even if you were highly skilled, preserves the USA. Do you think that white people are more valuable?
-
Thread is read by:
