Highlighted posts

    Welcome to the grind era of the Warriors!
    We are going to overwhelm teams with our forwards and sneak points where we can.
    Our forward pack are monsters, starters and the bench.
    I’d like to see our bench use improve.
    CNK showed his value and why he’s an integral part of our team.
    Tuapiki is a game breaker, Leiataua too.
    Average ref performance.
    IDC if we win by 1 or 100
    Embrace the grind and wars of attrition.

    I still despise Pompey.
     

    Expecting a big one from Naufahu Whyte

    Far out reading that he sounds like a Wahs player through and through, all the whanau back in Auckland...

    Can be negotiated with in November this year for 2027, how much are we offering him?

    Marata will be gone then (likely), so maybe we chuck a good 600k his way
     
    Took me a long time to re-watch the second game but here are my thoughts on it.
    The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

    Good:
    1. Really enjoying the cuts back to the middle on attack. When executed at speed, they work like a treat—either punching a hole in the defense or clustering the opposition into the tackle. A big improvement over last game's predictable pass-to-the-edge, followed by a bomb to the opposite wing. Would love to see it happen more on the left-hand side.
    2. Egan’s biggest impact in this game was recognizing when someone was offside and running straight at them. Not just him—Marata even pivoted his line to exploit an offside defender. This helped regain momentum in the first half.
    3. The minutes rotation for Barnett and Fish was much better. One was always on the field. Both started, and then Barnett stayed on until Fish was ready to return. This feels like the best way to start a game. Silly mistakes and poor defensive reads are the only things stopping us from starting strong, but those errors seem to decrease as the half progresses.
    4. We created a lot of line breaks. Metcalf was involved in both the JFH offload and the Taine intercept. Last year (and even last game), we just weren’t in position to support offloads or line breaks.
    5. That Ali try and Marata’s attempt were our bread and butter in 2023—glad to see we’re still going for it. With Ali and Marata there, it must be twice as dangerous compared to 2024’s Ford and Pompey.
    6. The ref made just enough bullshit calls to give us a fair preview of what the season will be like. Feels good to win so convincingly despite that.
    7. How the hell did Tuapiki score that try? That’s pure X-factor. Webster, you’ve got to keep him in the team—though I have no idea how, once DWZ returns.
    8. That defensive line speed... If there’s one thing I hope we keep from this game, it’s that.
    9. CHT’s short kicking game is excellent.
    10. We seem to be communicating a lot more. A key moment was Walker trying to strip the ball, telling Marata to exit the tackle. It resulted in a knock-on against us, but I love those heads-up plays.
    11. The celebrations and team chemistry are top-tier! We’re right up there with the Storm and Panthers in terms of culture. Even the players on the bench were hyped after every point.
    12. No pointless arguing with the ref—just asking the right questions without backchatting. If we want better calls in the future, this is the way to go, especially with the crackdown on dissent.
    13. The one positive from RTS’s defense was his handling of Olakau’atu. He chopped him down one-on-one twice—shoulder straight to the shin—allowing Pompey and CHT to rush in and smother him.
    14. Great fucking captain’s challenges.
    15. Love that the halves are backing their running game. CHT even takes quick play-the-balls like a prop sometimes.
    16. Our scramble defense looks solid.
    17. Underrated hit of the game: Leka rushing out of the line and smashing Brooks, forcing him to throw a pass at his center’s feet for a knock-on. That killed Manly’s comeback hopes. 18. Nailed every single conversion.

    Bad:
    1. This will improve over time, but right now, there’s a bit of a clash with having both Clark and Walker at lock. They’re both great, but they play different styles—Walker is a ball player first, runner second, while Clark is the opposite. Sometimes, the team seems to expect a Walker-style pass from Clark, or they wait for Walker to run when he’s actually looking to pass. As chemistry develops, this should turn into a real asset, giving us great attacking variation.
    2. Rust. This team needs more time to gel. A more motivated team would punish some of our defensive overlaps and misexecuted set plays. We overcame it through grit, but when we don’t have the energy to cover for mistakes, it could get rough.
    3. Long-distance kicking wasn’t great. In the second half, we were losing about 10 meters per set. Manly consistently kicked between our 10m and 20m line. Some kicks had good height, especially Metcalf’s in the last 10 minutes of the first half—one even led to a try. But overall, kicking (especially from CHT) wasn’t strong, and in a grinding game, this could cost us.
    4. CHT can’t match Metcalf’s kicking height right now. Twice, RTS chased to compete for a kick, but even though the kicks traveled 48m to their 20m line, they didn’t hang long enough for our edge to get under the ball.
    5. Slow starts. It happened in Round 1, and again in Round 2 at the start of both halves. This needs to be fixed, or better teams will bury us before we can fight back. Once we regain momentum, we hold it well, but we can’t keep gifting teams early dominance.
    6. RTS’s defensive reads are off. Not sure if it’s a communication issue with Pompey, but even if Pompey isn’t talking, RTS should trust him to mark his man—or at least communicate better himself.

    Ugly:
    1. Jamming in the centers to shut down the wings worked more often than not, but it still feels like an all-or-nothing gamble. I get it against Manly—given their height advantage, even if we win the one-on-one tackle, they could still offload easily. Maybe it could work consistently if we drill it more, but I’m not sure.
    2. Barnett kept getting bounced off tackles in the first 10 minutes.
    3. In the first 18 minutes, possession was 60-40 in Manly’s favor, and they only scored once. By the 35th minute, we flipped it to 60-40 in our favor and scored three tries. We’re still clunky, and one try came from Tuapiki’s insane evasiveness, but the attack is sharpening—just still a bit ugly.
    4. I love Walker and hope we re-sign him for at least another year, but he made poor decisions in this game. He tried to do too much—like taking a grubber instead of passing to CHT on the fifth. Hopefully, he was just overhyped.
    5. Way too many errors. Some were saved by captain’s challenges, but only because of other infractions, not because we didn’t actually make mistakes.
    6. Nearly had a repeat of Round 1’s intercept disaster—Metcalf threw a bad pass under pressure.
    7. During the sin-bin period, Metcalf made another costly mistake. He had some shaky moments throughout the game, but also some brilliant ones. This halves pairing has a massive ceiling—I’m sure it will improve over time and make Round 1’s struggles look like a fluke.

    Overall:
    This was a solid win, despite some shockingly bad referee decisions. The game was closer than some might think—Manly were just a few fumbles away from staying in it. There’s still plenty to improve on, but this match gave us a much better idea of how the boys want to play.
     
    I'm not sure if others feel the same way but I do think that we are missing a step in our go-forward so far this year, something we essentially led the comp in for the last 2 years. I suspect it's not just the loss of AFB but also because of the changes in our back five. Sure Marcelo and DWZ had their moments in defense, but their carries out of own half was instrumental in our dominating the comp last year in running meters. We're just not getting the same out of TT and RTS.

    Not sure you can put RTS in there currently - 180m average after 2 games, 4.5 tackle busts a game, 2 line breaks and 2 tries. Plenty of go forward.

    So far he's looked elite imo. Still early days tho.

    It's quite funny looking at the difference in him playing centre last year and wing this year. He looked a fish out of water at times, and with his big price tag he was underperforming so probably had a bit more pressure on him.
    This year he looks more comfortable, and while the price tag is still there he's able to play that roll well, so there's a fair bit of value for the team.

    I think he'll finish the year with 15-20 tries and loads of running meters and tackle busts
     
    haven't been able to watch the full game and hopefully someone can comment on whether Laban, Berry,TMM, Boyd etc looked this good through the whole game
    My thoughts from the game were that Boyd and TMM are starting to form a very good combination and understanding. Berry looked good for the hit out and a step above Cup level. I'd continue to play him there for the next 4 rounds with a view to bringing him back in to first grade after the Broncos game. Laban is in the right grade for now IMO. Might be an unpopular view but I think he is still improving and needs to develop a little bit more of a harder edge. I think he is still finding out what he is capable of and I'd look to start introducing him in the back half of the season to first grade if there aren't injury forced changes before then. Those 4 players are the most obvious ones pushing for first team. Behind them Healey,Lussick, Ale and Afoa. Bunty doesn't stand out but he does absolutely nothing wrong, just does his job and does it well IMO.

    Kosi is a definite never again from me.
     
    probably the wrong forum, but good to see the reserves continuing to pressure the first team. Haven't been able to watch the full game and hopefully someone can comment on whether Laban, Berry,TMM, Boyd etc looked this good through the whole game


    I feel like Berry's back soon for Pompey, which is why they're keeping Metcalf kicking (Tough for Pompey though, I still feel he's better than this board gives him credit for, but couldn't pick him ahead of Ali or Berry). Laban is the unluckiest not to be in FG, hell of a turn of pace in the wing try too. Would be a risk to have 3 young guns on the bench, but if he's playing 80m, 177m he's more likely to bump ford rather than Leka or Demi.

    While our 1st team lacks genuine star power, I don't remember a time we've enjoyed this much depth. Ever.
     
    Just watching the highlights again and the thing I love most about Tauapiki's try is it was a high IQ play.
    Tauapiki went across the park and singled out Jazz and Sipley specifically.
    It was eyes up footy and something that he created from nothing.

    I think that now we've seen he can handle being in the back 3 and the obvious targeting he will get because of his size, I feel the benefit of him being at the back with his hands on the footy more, is only gunna be a good thing for this team. I think by the seasons end well see it as more important to us than what Charnz can provide
     
Back
Top Bottom