Post Match 2023 Penrith vs Warriors - Week 1 Finals (Post Match)

[Beastmode]

The bunker reviews every try. It was confirmed.

yeah, but Hardyman's Yugo was not wrong. it did not go upstairs to the bunker for the decision. the ref made it on the spot.

had it gone upstairs for the decision bunker would / should have looked at the motion frame by frame...

 

[run_it_str8_again]

The bunker reviews every try. It was confirmed.

Must have been the turbo bunker......."was it Pemriff? We have a decision"

 

[Beastmode]

Must have been the turbo bunker......."was it Pemriff? We have a decision"

rhetorial decision

is it a try? of course its a try......

 

[Inruin]

Still frames are exactly what the bunker looks at and interprets. cant change the rules to suit.

And momentum is the not same as planting a ball down. one can argue that is a knock on given the last frame shows his wrist on the ball....

Frame by frame, in sequence is what they look at. Not two shots chosen by you. The reviews showed the ball touching the line under control of the player.

The thing we should be focusing on is our errors in defence leading to the try. Barnett creating the space on the cut back, Walker jumping out of the line, composure and resilience gone missing

 

[run_it_str8_again]

This post match thread is never going to be resolved.

 

[Inruin]

Must have been the turbo bunker......."was it Pemriff? We have a decision"

Got replayed several times before it was confirmed on the coverage I watched.

 

[run_it_str8_again]

Got replayed several times before it was confirmed on the coverage I watched.

I was in transit listening on the wireless. That's my transcript of the commentary. It was fast between live grounding and try being given during listening. No more your honour

 

[sup42]

This post match thread is never going to be resolved.

Not unless Beastmode works out Inruin has never been wrong.

Doctor Strange Vs Dormmamu.

 

[Inruin]

This post match thread is never going to be resolved.

We leaked 32 points and struggled to score 6. Looking for maybes with ref decisions are not where the answers to our performance lie

 

[Beastmode]

Frame by frame, in sequence is what they look at. Not two shots chosen by you. The reviews showed the ball touching the line under control of the player.

The thing we should be focusing on is our errors in defence leading to the try. Barnett creating the space on the cut back, Walker jumping out of the line, composure and resilience gone missing

the 10m penalty given by the ref to bring Penrith down our end right before that try- go look at the replay.

Nikoure was behind TMM when he kicked it putting everyone on side when he got to Dylan Edwards first... how is that a 10m penalty...??????

Please explain that one to me ref????????

 

[run_it_str8_again]

We leaked 32 points and struggled to score 6. Looking for maybes with ref decisions are not where the answers to our performance lie

I know. I just need 46 pages to flush out the ref hate before I get to actual analysis

 

[Beastmode]

We leaked 32 points and struggled to score 6. Looking for maybes with ref decisions are not where the answers to our performance lie

mate the first 20 pages has been dedicated to talking about our mistakes..

time to analyse these unconcious bias reffing decisions...

 

[run_it_str8_again]

the 10m penalty given by the ref to bring Penrith down our end right before that try- go look at the replay.

Nikoure was behind TMM when he kicked it putting everyone on side when he got to Dylan Edwards first... how is that a 10m penalty...??????

Please explain that one to me ref????????

Ref to Warriors. Explanation is this.....You are not winning this game today. Offside Warriors.

 

[Inruin]

the 10m penalty given by the ref to bring Penrith down our end right before that try- go look at the replay.

Nikoure was behind TMM when he kicked it putting everyone on side when he got to Dylan Edwards first... how is that a 10m penalty...??????

Please explain that one to me ref????????

I can't comment as you haven't included still frames to support what you are asking about

 

[Ryno 2.0]

Random still frames

I thought using still frames was indeed a scientific method to show hand / ball separation. It is also the preferred way to calculate velocity of players.

 

[Inruin]

I thought using still frames was indeed a scientific method to show hand / ball separation. It is also the preferred way to calculate velocity of players.

Only if you have an officially licensed jonno stopwatch to support them

 

[Beastmode]

I can't comment as you haven't included still frames to support what you are asking about

God you’re hopeless ref

 

[Aman 2.0]

as I watched the raiders v knights today I had a thought regarding the offside rule.

Why do they zoom in on every single (without fail, never ever is it not) tackle towards the end just as the play of the ball is about to happen. You never ever get to see if players are actually offside or not and never have they ever shown a replay of an inside the 10 or offside penalty. It’s always just play on - unless it’s obviously offside so they can show that the ref was right.

I find this sooooo fucking strange it annoys the fuck out of it me because it’s such a power play by the NRL to have some control over the game without any scrutiny.

I agree with the poster about our first offside penalty against Nuikora when we. Had them pinned in thier half. I checked it multiple times and he was well onside.

Recently I’ve decided that this is entertainment and anything can happen. Don’t take it too seriously and just enjoy the spectacle.

 

[Inruin]

God you’re hopeless ref

View attachment 538

View attachment 540

View attachment 539

I'll watch the replay tomorrow. Couple of points/questions. Who is the player in the bottom frame to the left of Niukore that gets involved in the play and was he onside? Was it him who was penalised? Niukore looks onside but he can't make an offside player onside. Only TMM as the kicker of the ball can do that

 

[sup42]

as I watched the raiders v knights today I had a thought regarding the offside rule.

Why do they zoom in on every single (without fail, never ever is it not) tackle towards the end just as the play of the ball is about to happen. You never ever get to see if players are actually offside or not and never have they ever shown a replay of an inside the 10 or offside penalty. It’s always just play on - unless it’s obviously offside so they can show that the ref was right.

I find this sooooo fucking strange it annoys the fuck out of it me because it’s such a power play by the NRL to have some control over the game without any scrutiny.

I agree with the poster about our first offside penalty against Nuikora when we. Had them pinned in thier half. I checked it multiple times and he was well onside.

Recently I’ve decided that this is entertainment and anything can happen. Don’t take it too seriously and just enjoy the spectacle.

Good discussion and yes it is deliberate to ignore the off side to protect the reff because the reffs use subjective guesses on where the ten meters is.
They obviously do not have a laser in their heads or a tape measure so it is impossible to get a fair game.
Usually we get taken back 12 meters to the oppositions ten or less.

You can see this clearly from the nose bleed seats at the ground.