General RD 21 preview-nrl.com

[sebastian_old]

RD 21 Preview Panthers v Warriors
Wednesday, July 26, 2006 - 2:36 PM



The Panthers are fast running out of chances. A crucial game for them.



Form: Things were looking up for the Panthers with three wins from their past four games until their second-half blowout against Manly.



The Panthers were hammered 26-6 after half-time. Momentum generated by the Warriors was slowed by losses to the Eels and Bulldogs.



History: Penrith had won the past six games straight before the Warriors shaded them 28-22 in Auckland not so long ago back in round 17.



Danger sign: The Warriors invariably have trouble containing Panthers’ hooker Luke Priddis (pictured). He has bagged a try in four of his past five games against them.



Best Bet? These teams average over 50 points per game in total match points.



Take the Overs option in Under/Overs betting.



Money-spinner: Following on from last week’s effort by the Panthers, take a Penrith/Warriors result in the Half/Full Double.

Source: Big League

 

[Skinny_Ravs82]

Stupidest preview I've seen! LOL. Not even a SINGLE mention of the Warriors..blab on and on about the Panthers. Pfft! *shows disgust*

 

[Jesbass_old]

Stupidest preview I've seen! LOL. Not even a SINGLE mention of the Warriors..blab on and on about the Panthers. Pfft! *shows disgust*

Do you mean, apart from where they picked us to win? Lol... :lol:

 

[Skinny_Ravs82]

Stupidest preview I've seen! LOL. Not even a SINGLE mention of the Warriors..blab on and on about the Panthers. Pfft! *shows disgust*

Do you mean, apart from where they picked us to win? Lol... :lol:

lol well yeah. The whole thing basically surronds the Panthers and the only time the name 'Warriors' comes up is, as you say when they picked us to win. Probably a goood thing but still; aren't these things meant to be fair mentions? Despite the fact we didn't play last weekend.

 

[Jesbass_old]

Stupidest preview I've seen! LOL. Not even a SINGLE mention of the Warriors..blab on and on about the Panthers. Pfft! *shows disgust*

Do you mean, apart from where they picked us to win? Lol... :lol:

lol well yeah. The whole thing basically surronds the Panthers and the only time the name 'Warriors' comes up is, as you say when they picked us to win. Probably a goood thing but still; aren't these things meant to be fair mentions? Despite the fact we didn't play last weekend.

I'm still not quite sure what you're seeing there, Skins. Take a look at this:

RD 21 Preview Panthers v Warriors
Wednesday, July 26, 2006 - 2:36 PM



The Panthers are fast running out of chances. A crucial game for them.



Form: Things were looking up for the Panthers with three wins from their past four games until their second-half blowout against Manly.



The Panthers were hammered 26-6 after half-time. Momentum generated by the Warriors was slowed by losses to the Eels and Bulldogs.



History: Penrith had won the past six games straight before the Warriors shaded them 28-22 in Auckland not so long ago back in round 17.



Danger sign: The Warriors invariably have trouble containing Panthers’ hooker Luke Priddis (pictured). He has bagged a try in four of his past five games against them.



Best Bet? These teams average over 50 points per game in total match points.



Take the Overs option in Under/Overs betting.



Money-spinner: Following on from last week’s effort by the Panthers, take a Penrith/Warriors result in the Half/Full Double.

Source: Big League

The Warriors are mentioned in all the categories: form, history, danger sign and money-spinner. So...how is this completely biased towards the Panthers? :?

 

[warriorfaithful*_old]

Stupidest preview I've seen! LOL. Not even a SINGLE mention of the Warriors..blab on and on about the Panthers. Pfft! *shows disgust*

Do you mean, apart from where they picked us to win? Lol... :lol:

lol well yeah. The whole thing basically surronds the Panthers and the only time the name 'Warriors' comes up is, as you say when they picked us to win. Probably a goood thing but still; aren't these things meant to be fair mentions? Despite the fact we didn't play last weekend.

I'm still not quite sure what you're seeing there, Skins. Take a look at this:

RD 21 Preview Panthers v Warriors
Wednesday, July 26, 2006 - 2:36 PM



The Panthers are fast running out of chances. A crucial game for them.



Form: Things were looking up for the Panthers with three wins from their past four games until their second-half blowout against Manly.



The Panthers were hammered 26-6 after half-time. Momentum generated by the Warriors was slowed by losses to the Eels and Bulldogs.



History: Penrith had won the past six games straight before the Warriors shaded them 28-22 in Auckland not so long ago back in round 17.



Danger sign: The Warriors invariably have trouble containing Panthers’ hooker Luke Priddis (pictured). He has bagged a try in four of his past five games against them.



Best Bet? These teams average over 50 points per game in total match points.



Take the Overs option in Under/Overs betting.



Money-spinner: Following on from last week’s effort by the Panthers, take a Penrith/Warriors result in the Half/Full Double.

Source: Big League

The Warriors are mentioned in all the categories: form, history, danger sign and money-spinner. So...how is this completely biased towards the Panthers? :?

I'm with skinny ravs on the whole preview being centred around penrith. I mean the danger sign might mention the warriors but they are actually talking about luke priddis(panthers) the money spinner mentions both the panthers and warriors and apart from that we get about 5 words in the whole preview centred on the warriors. And that talks about us losing games lol.

 

[Jesbass_old]

Regardless of any bias, I still stand by my point. There was definitely more than a single mention of the Warriors.

 

[Skinny_Ravs82]

:mrgreen: thanks partner!

 

[warriorfaithful*_old]

:mrgreen: thanks partner!

lol no problem i've always got your back.