| | ||
|---|---|---|
 | | |
| 01 Jan 1970 12:00 minute | ||
snake77
The commentators queried how Kearney would use his bench with the two smaller guys and how he would rotate them so all 3 aren't on the field at the same time. Easy he'd just to what he does every week.
I know he favours Tevaga but surely the better option would be to replace Luke with the specialist dummy half instead of the regimented bring Tevaga on after 25-30 minutes. Even with the weeks off due to injury Roache should of been able to make it through to half time and then continue his stint at the start of the second half.
I know he favours Tevaga but surely the better option would be to replace Luke with the specialist dummy half instead of the regimented bring Tevaga on after 25-30 minutes. Even with the weeks off due to injury Roache should of been able to make it through to half time and then continue his stint at the start of the second half.
Fonzies Tram Line
jsmooove
Fearmuss
snake77
Haha. Most chicks binge after a break up. Well that's what the occasional chick flick I watch with my missus indicates. Men binge or drink after their team loses. Your team loses more often than you break up with someone so we get a raw deal.
Our side is even more of a cause to binge/drink.
Doesn't matter how "ready" we are for the Storm. Speed alone means they will eat us alive on the edges.
Ado-Carr and Vunivalu will have 3 tries between them and that's if Munster and Hughes even allow the ball to get out that far.
Ado-Carr and Vunivalu will have 3 tries between them and that's if Munster and Hughes even allow the ball to get out that far.
Warrior482
wizards rage
Summing it up from me:
We had the attack/ opportunities just crucial errors and bad luck cost us.
We played with intensity and defensively I thought we were dominant. Can’t complain about lack of effort
Game was win and lost in game management. We were directionless and trying to win every attack when we should have been building pressure. They were hitting 40/20’s slowing us down by finding touch and accurate when they were in our 20.
We were camped in their 20 for long periods and couldn’t quiet get it together. They took every opportunity.
Usual suspects had usual errors but for me Blake Green missing has now cost us 2 wins in a row.
We had the attack/ opportunities just crucial errors and bad luck cost us.
We played with intensity and defensively I thought we were dominant. Can’t complain about lack of effort
Game was win and lost in game management. We were directionless and trying to win every attack when we should have been building pressure. They were hitting 40/20’s slowing us down by finding touch and accurate when they were in our 20.
We were camped in their 20 for long periods and couldn’t quiet get it together. They took every opportunity.
Usual suspects had usual errors but for me Blake Green missing has now cost us 2 wins in a row.
Mr Bob
Contributor
jsmooove
must be a smart sponsorship choice for woodstock to sponsor the warriors. playing 4d chess there knowing every warriors fans need to drink to forget performances like this
I think they'll be ready - as in "fully lubed for a pumping" ready.
snake77
This game was similar to the Tigers game where they had a classy experienced player who could find the clutch plays their side needs at the right time.
Farah tore us a new one whenever we didn't number up defensively or were lazy around the ruck. Morgan didn't dominate in terms of dominating the game directing them around the field but he was getting the right plays when needed. Compare that to us and our squad is missing that player. Roger Tuivasa-Sheck isn't in the right position for that, Luke isn't 100% but it isn't really is strength. We have an organising half but he's out injured.
Next week we are up against the master at those sorts of plays.
FuNQie
It’s a sad time. There are players other than Roger Tuivasa-Sheck who are in it to win it; Bunty’s head holding at the end spoke loudly. Roger Tuivasa-Sheck is getting all the plaudits from the commentator, and rightly so, but he’s not the only one giving his all, as wallacenz says.
But it’s only Roger Tuivasa-Sheck who's consistently showing any flair. Chanel Harris-Tavita - was that an off day, mate? I hope so, coz otherwise, just three games in, you’ve got Warriors malaise. Get out of it, mate, before it kills your fresh new career in the spotlight!
All that time in the opposition 20 and what do we have to show for it? A real time training exercise for the Cowboys.
What’s the point for us? We’ll spend the next 4 or 5 months kicking Kearney, Kata and a few others, but nothing will change. Endless futility.
But it’s only Roger Tuivasa-Sheck who's consistently showing any flair. Chanel Harris-Tavita - was that an off day, mate? I hope so, coz otherwise, just three games in, you’ve got Warriors malaise. Get out of it, mate, before it kills your fresh new career in the spotlight!
All that time in the opposition 20 and what do we have to show for it? A real time training exercise for the Cowboys.
What’s the point for us? We’ll spend the next 4 or 5 months kicking Kearney, Kata and a few others, but nothing will change. Endless futility.
Warrior482
Dragons, Eels, Tigers, Raiders, Panthers, Titans, Dogs, Knights. Which team should i support. Can't stand the rest.
I must say I got a bit angry ... sad and angry.
"Sangry" if you will.
After being forced to eat that Saturday night shit sandwich, the only redemption would be walloping the Storm on Thursday night, which does not seem at all likely, except in some parallel f***ing universe.
wallacenz
Titans dont have a premiership, and the Eels and Knights have been cellar dwellers forever.
I'd take the knights from that group
Tigers/Raiders were my teams before the Warriors. Both will have a better season than us so can't go wrong.
Similar threads
- Poll
razzrillinger
Miket12
- Poll
jonesy101
john nick
- Poll
Matulino's Left Shoulder
