tell Manu to stop saving his ass and let him fall
what is that about? how is Manu saving his ass?
We get it. Ads aren't what you are here for. NZWarriors.com has been up for almost 20 years and relies on ad revenue to help keep the server running.
Please add us to your ad blocker's whitelist or disable to run on our website. Alternatively, click here to upgrade your account to remove all ads.
tell Manu to stop saving his ass and let him fall
From being a fool on the footy show... Did you not see Manu pull him to the side a couple of times and tone him down, sure they were having fun no problems there, but there is a boundary to keep too. So nothing real serious that's going to destroy the club. but could be embarrassing PR wise.what is that about? how is Manu saving his ass?
Mate no point in dropping that and not letting us know. The place is a shambles it's best to get it out in the open even if it's just rumour so we can understand more clearly with who the buck(pardon the pun) stops. We've had enough bs who are these twits.Ya reckon? I was surprised when cappy went down that path with veitchy. I mean yeah, he's right, but Hurrell didn't drop the ball in the end zone for the roosters to win.
I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't watch that vid and think 'not again'. There's actually a worse one out with him lately but I ain't putting it up lol.
But there's more issues in the team than Hurrell. Heaps more. He's just an easy target
Oh please don't be so silly
If anyone bothered to read this article we would not be debating Konnie now. The Rugby high performance team identified exactly what we have taken 3 years to discover about the deficiencies in his game and in his character.Wasn't there an article in the Herald a while back about the Blues/Auckland development and how they had looked at Hurrell along with Malekai Fekitoa, the same vintage at college
They didn't actually come out and say Konnie was a dead head and therefore didn't get anointed but the inference was there that they were looking for attitude and commitment which was perhaps lacking.
Will see if I can dig it out.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11249107
Found it. More about his skill set rather attitude etc. Good read though bearing in mind what we know now.
What would be Konrads yoyo score? HaIf anyone bothered to read this article we would not be debating Konnie now. The Rugby high performance team identified exactly what we have taken 3 years to discover about the deficiencies in his game and in his character.
"We did a lot of analysis on both of them," recalls Auckland high performance director Ant Strachan. "Konrad was a bit more physical and a bit bigger. Malakai was better in his footwork, dexterity and speed and repeat speed endurance. He was one of the fittest players actually, recording up around 19 to 20 in the yo-yo test.
"Konrad's pass and catch was marginal, particularly off his left hand, and he had a tendency to plant his feet on defence and put his head down. He couldn't kick either.
The concern with Hurrell as a rugby player was his lack of repeat speed. His size was an obvious strength, a less obvious weakness. There wasn't much evidence either of Hurrell being an exploiter of space once he'd bulldozed his way through the first line of defence.
If posters took a little time to read some of the great stuff that gets posted here they would spend less time defending a very talented player at schoolboy level who cannot and will never adapt at adult level because of his flippant attitude.
What would be Konrads yoyo score? Ha
What's silly? If Kyrios doesn't improve he only hurts himself, if Konnie doesn't improve he hurts his teammates as well, and Konnie has a lot he needs to improve.
If anyone bothered to read this article we would not be debating Konnie now. The Rugby high performance team identified exactly what we have taken 3 years to discover about the deficiencies in his game and in his character.
"We did a lot of analysis on both of them," recalls Auckland high performance director Ant Strachan. "Konrad was a bit more physical and a bit bigger. Malakai was better in his footwork, dexterity and speed and repeat speed endurance. He was one of the fittest players actually, recording up around 19 to 20 in the yo-yo test.
"Konrad's pass and catch was marginal, particularly off his left hand, and he had a tendency to plant his feet on defence and put his head down. He couldn't kick either.
The concern with Hurrell as a rugby player was his lack of repeat speed. His size was an obvious strength, a less obvious weakness. There wasn't much evidence either of Hurrell being an exploiter of space once he'd bulldozed his way through the first line of defence.
If posters took a little time to read some of the great stuff that gets posted here they would spend less time defending a very talented player at schoolboy level who cannot and will never adapt at adult level because of his flippant attitude.
is that a fitness test or his diet?What would be Konrads yoyo score? Ha
If anyone bothered to read this article we would not be debating Konnie now. The Rugby high performance team identified exactly what we have taken 3 years to discover about the deficiencies in his game and in his character.
"We did a lot of analysis on both of them," recalls Auckland high performance director Ant Strachan. "Konrad was a bit more physical and a bit bigger. Malakai was better in his footwork, dexterity and speed and repeat speed endurance. He was one of the fittest players actually, recording up around 19 to 20 in the yo-yo test.
"Konrad's pass and catch was marginal, particularly off his left hand, and he had a tendency to plant his feet on defence and put his head down. He couldn't kick either.
The concern with Hurrell as a rugby player was his lack of repeat speed. His size was an obvious strength, a less obvious weakness. There wasn't much evidence either of Hurrell being an exploiter of space once he'd bulldozed his way through the first line of defence.
If posters took a little time to read some of the great stuff that gets posted here they would spend less time defending a very talented player at schoolboy level who cannot and will never adapt at adult level because of his flippant attitude.
The point being that if we had done our homework we would not have paid the outrageous salary that he is now getting for being off the field more than he is on it. Most on here were impressed in his first season and called for his re-signing when all he ever did was "exactly as that article says" stampede over lesser opponents from 10 or 20 meters out. While he did make an impact in that first year he has never been able to repeat it and spends more time in Reserve grade banned or warming the pine.When you summarised the imp. points out of that article in your post, you missed out one -
"It was our view with Konrad that we were looking at an athlete who was ideally suited to league."
so whats your point?
He's hardly been a 1 season wonder, last year was pretty good when you consider he was playing with a busted wrist for much of it and started the season with a bout of morbid obesity.The point being that if we had done our homework we would not have paid the outrageous salary that he is now getting for being off the field more than he is on it. Most on here were impressed in his first season and called for his re-signing when all he ever did was "exactly as that article says" stampede over lesser opponents from 10 or 20 meters out. While he did make an impact in that first year he has never been able to repeat it and spends more time in Reserve grade banned or warming the pine.