You make the following excuses:
Then you make an honest assessment of Konnies laziness but then offer a piss poor excuse about it not being his fault:
Was that in context

???
No, it just suggests you're either choosing to interpret / represent things in an incorrect manner, or lacking comprehension. From your posts I think you're a person of reasonable intelligence so I doubt it's the latter, and selectively quoting from an obviously ponderous ramble across multiple posts seems to confirm it.
Anyway!
...
I am not a fan of Konrad's laziness, or a proponent of allowing it to continue. That would be fucking retarded. What I am trying to say is players are not created equal, in any aspect of their skillset or persona. Konrad has massive physical ability but lacks the inner drive to take full advantage of it.
If Konnie cannot bully himself, the Warriors need to recognise that and make selection / contractual / disciplinary motions to force his hand. Matthew Elliot finally did that, but not until it was too late from a "fielding your strongest team" POV... early this season. (Here I am praising some efforts the club has made, once again I have not praised anything about Konnie except his natural ability).
Konrad is not the only player who gets away with shitty on or off field behaviour, presentation and effort. This is where I start to head to the club being equally to blame for allowing these issues to further develop.
EQUALLY. Please tell me this is clear enough haha... but if it isn't:
"But sometimes you can't just apply the Rule of the Ruthless. Hurrell could turn up half pissed on game day, hangover pie still in hand, and probably stand a good chance of winning the game for us. I honestly believe that."
Praising his natural ability, an inarguable quality. And bemoaning the fact we can't just afford to ditch such talent. I'd prefer lazy players to be average ones, not potential superstars.
"First thought is he's a young guy who grew up in the islands, probably from a very different cultural background to us. I'm not meaning to imply Tongans are lazy by nature, but there is the classic laid-back friendly islander stereotype which Konnie seems to typify."
How is this an excuse? That is called an observation, my friend.
"Culture aside, I actually think he's just a chilled out, happy-go-lucky kind of guy."
See above, a subjective observation of Konrad's nature.
"He does not need to put in the extra yards at training and live a fascist health and fitness lifestyle. Natural talent can be a blessing and a curse."
Once again, some careful thought would probably lead to the conclusion I was saying he can maintain a pro sports career while being a lazy fuck, which is true. This is not saying I want it to continue as such, merely that it's developed this way. Blessing in such ability, curse in becoming too relaxed.
"Our club is a quagmire of agenda, unprofessional-ism and inefficiency. We constantly talk of signing "seasoned Australians" and "hardened veterans" to bring about a culture change, add professionalism and work ethic."
This line doesn't even mention Hurrell, and refers to some pretty obvious shit. What part do you disagree with?
The ongoing theme here is taking my subjective observations of Konrad Hurrell's character and interpreting them as excuses. I haven't given a single excuse for his short-comings... possible explanations perhaps? But not excuses.
I do however believe the club has a responsibility to motivate and develop the talent of any young player, even if they have some issues motivating themselves. And I think in the not so distant past we have utterly failed to do so.