
Miket12
Unsure if I can find that but only 0.00000036% of the world’s population are billionaires but they own 3.5% of the world’s wealth.Can you break down the share of the top 0.1% as a percentage of the 1% wealth internationally?
We get it. Ads aren't what you are here for. NZWarriors.com has been up for almost 20 years and relies on ad revenue to help keep the server running.
Please add us to your ad blocker's whitelist or disable to run on our website. Alternatively, click here to upgrade your account to remove all ads.
Unsure if I can find that but only 0.00000036% of the world’s population are billionaires but they own 3.5% of the world’s wealth.Can you break down the share of the top 0.1% as a percentage of the 1% wealth internationally?
I understand there are plenty of generous people who are in extreme wealth too. Your next post highlights where I’m coming from with my sentiment.TBH, it’s not the 1 percenters, both internationally and NZ, where I think the issue is. According to a report from the CTU last year, the two wealthiest Kiwis combined net worth is greater that the combined net wealth of the lowest 30%.
The founder of Farmers, Robert Laidlaw was, at in stage, one of the richest men in NZ. He was also a Christian who, when he started Farmers, donated 10% of his income. When he sold the business, he was donating over 80%.
It’s hard to see how to distribute the extreme wealth. You’d think communism would be an answer but of the top countries with the most billionaires, one is still a communist country (China), one is a communist territory (HK) while a third is a former communist country (Russia).I understand there are plenty of generous people who are in extreme wealth too. Your next post highlights where I’m coming from with my sentiment.
Trying to see if you qualify?Can you break down the share of the top 0.1% as a percentage of the 1% wealth internationally?
This highlights the whole problem.If you’re married and on the jobseeker benefit in NZ, you “earn“ more than 90% of the world’s working population.
The only way is probably decency, so never going to happen. How would your death tax work? The way property has become, an inheritance is probably the only way many will own a home. There may also not be such an emphasis on owning your own home in future generations?It’s hard to see how to distribute the extreme wealth. You’d think communism would be an answer but of the top countries with the most billionaires, one is still a communist country (China), one is a communist territory (HK) while a third is a former communist country (Russia).
It would seem, the versions of communism around the world hasn’t eliminated extreme wealth either.
I’d like to see an introduction of death duty in NZ, with a progressive system to help rebalance the economy.
Bring it in so under a certain amount, there is no death duty (DD) and then increase the tax as the inheritance value increases.The only way is probably decency, so never going to happen. How would your death tax work? The way property has become, an inheritance is probably the only way many will own a home. There may also not be such an emphasis on owning your own home in future generations?
Turns out Biden was overseas he was in Ukraine at the time what was he doing there he wasnt running for president he wasnt trying to build better diplomatic relationships next question is why was Hunter paying 50 k a month for rent in aarket that was around 5k a month.Biden was overseas at the time of transition from Obama to Trump. It was staff that removed the files.
Trump could have used the same excuse, and returned the files, and nobody would have known anything about it...but he didn't...and still isn't.
That won't stop Fox though.
Turns out Biden was overseas he was in Ukraine at the time what was he doing there he wasnt running for president he wasnt trying to build better diplomatic relationships next question is why was Hunter paying 50 k a month for rent in aarket that was around 5k a month.
Was he getting the big guy his 10 percent?
His crack head son had access to those documents the nation's secrets atleast at maralago they were locked up.
But with Joey Bids it was OK because his corvette was in the shed.
Turns out Biden was overseas he was in Ukraine at the time what was he doing there he wasnt running for president he wasnt trying to build better diplomatic relationships next question is why was Hunter paying 50 k a month for rent in aarket that was around 5k a month.
Was he getting the big guy his 10 percent?
His crack head son had access to those documents the nation's secrets atleast at maralago they were locked up.
But with Joey Bids it was OK because his corvette was in the shed.
If you look at the Hunter Biden issue, the guy is a sad fuck for sure. FFS he even had an affair with his late brothers missus, so he is fair game to be called a loser.
However, more to the point...
On MSNBC today Chuck Todd asked GOP Congressman Ron Johnson (a visitor to Russia during the Trump years) if Hunter was such a bad guy, what about Jared Kushner scoring US$2 billion from the Saudis.
Are they going to investigate that?
Johnson spat the dummy and accused Todd of left wing bias. He then went on a rant so Todd could not reply. Todd politely told him to go back to Fox.
Sorry guys, and all you носок русский тролль on here, but the word is that Kushner sold classified information to the Saudis to get himself out of the shite with that real estate deal in Manhattan.
Whatever Hunter Biden did, and according to Johnson it was shagging Russian hookers FFS...that was nothing in comparison.
Also just gotta say.
General Michael Flynn. a traitorous Trump stooge and Russian asset claims the Biden documents were planted by Democrats because they don't want him to stand in 2024.
Add to that it is well known that Biden does not trust his Secret Service guys.
So those things are now in the public domain, what they means I don't know, but to me something smells fishy.
It should be investigated I wonder why the democrats did not when they had the power, but they were infatuated with trying to get Trump. Anything come of Trumps taxes?However, more to the point...
On MSNBC today Chuck Todd asked GOP Congressman Ron Johnson (a visitor to Russia during the Trump years) if Hunter was such a bad guy, what about Jared Kushner scoring US$2 billion from the Saudis.
Are they going to investigate that?
Yes I have heard that theory as well who would the democrats put up to run. Certainly not Harris or the governor of California.Also just gotta say.
General Michael Flynn. a traitorous Trump stooge and Russian asset claims the Biden documents were planted by Democrats because they don't want him to stand in 2024.
Add to that it is well known that Biden does not trust his Secret Service guys.
So those things are now in the public domain, what they means I don't know, but to me something smells fishy.
I think there is an any anybody but feeling in the party, although planting classified documents sounds far fetched.Yes I have heard that theory as well who would the democrats put up to run. Certainly not Harris or the governor of California.
I think there is an any anybody but feeling in the party, although planting classified documents sounds far fetched.
To be fair it is a bad look on Biden, even though he has cooperated with the DOJ. Biden is clearly past his prime, and they only need him to beat Trump, who will not be running.
There are plenty of candidates in the wings, especially women. Gretchen Whitmer was Bidens choice for VP, but she wasn't black or from California. Amy Klobuchar is pretty smart, and there are others.
However ladies and jellybeans, and to all the носок русский тролль on here, the word is that Kushner delivered classified documents on nuclear armaments to MBS (Saudi buzz saw) for Trump.
Why you might ask?
Well you might ask why Mohamad buzz saw gave US$2 billion to Jared Kushner? Cos he surely did, no doubt about that.
Yet the GOP refuses to look at Kushner...where did they get their money from?If true Kushner should spend the rest of his days in a windowless cell. Hunter Biden needs to be investigated as well.
You must have read Atlas Shrugged or something Wiz.Depends… what’s the definition of new wealth?
‘The top 1 percent have captured nearly twice as much new wealth as the rest of the world during that period, according to Oxfam's annual inequality report, released Sunday. Their fortune soared by $26 trillion, while the bottom 99 percent only saw their net worth rise by $16 trillion.’
New wealth is generated by innovation, business, invention and capital investment. The ‘rich’ are creating it and the poor whose wealth has still risen $16 trillion has benefited. If you are not prepared to risk and don’t ‘create’, like 99% of the population, how much do you expect of the ‘created’ new wealth?
I think the solution is more than just trying to tax more income which hasn’t worked - wealth is very different to income.
But we also need to be careful what we wish for… Without the innovators and risk takers, the poor may not get that 16 trillion in new wealth…
Had never heard of it but I googled it because of you 👍You must have read Atlas Shrugged or something Wiz.
Always room for improvement mateHad never heard of it but I googled it because of you 👍
Capitalism isn’t perfect but it’s delivered unprecedented increases in the standard of living world wide and much higher than every other economic system.
Yea, there’s extreme inequality but as the stats show even the lowest NZers are in the top 10% of incomes worldwide. Our poverty in NZ is luxury compared to lives 100 years ago.