General Guilt vs Innocence

Messages
2,665
Reaction score
4,792
Joined
May 19, 2012

Mr Frank White

1st Grade Fringe
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,665
Reaction score
4,792
Not Guilty is not the same as innocent.
Ahh that old ignorant cliche.. Actually that's exactly what it means in legal terms. In Latin the saying is " Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat" which is where we get "innocent until proven guilty", the cornerstone of the western justice system..

Ranger wasn't proven guilty, ergo he is innocent..
 
Messages
1,228
Reaction score
995
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Spence

Spence

Sgt. Pepper
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
1,228
Reaction score
995
Yes, and the corner stone of Western justice was first developed in Ancient Greece, where men such as Gorgias taught rhetoric language to sway courts. 'Tis the same now - a good lawyer can help make someone that isn't innocent found not guilty.
 
Messages
590
Reaction score
1,117
Joined
May 16, 2012
charlie bobmarley

charlie bobmarley

1st Grade Fringe
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
590
Reaction score
1,117
Ahh that old ignorant cliche.. Actually that's exactly what it means in legal terms. In Latin the saying is " Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat" which is where we get "innocent until proven guilty", the cornerstone of the western justice system..

Ranger wasn't proven guilty, ergo he is innocent..
you're right, he's as innocent as OJ Simpson.
 
Messages
6,081
Reaction score
7,773
Joined
May 1, 2012
¿N. ig-mah¿

¿N. ig-mah¿

Warriors 1st Grader
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
6,081
Reaction score
7,773
Ahh that old ignorant cliche.. Actually that's exactly what it means in legal terms. In Latin the saying is " Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat" which is where we get "innocent until proven guilty", the cornerstone of the western justice system..

Ranger wasn't proven guilty, ergo he is innocent..
Isn't the whole reason they call it "not guilty" vs "innocent" for the simple fact that they have only proven a possibility that someone else may have commited the crime, or that the crime may not have taken place (or a lack of evidence of guilt), thereby it is only a lack of proof of guilt as opposed to any proof of innocence.

To me "innocent until proven guilty" has always been a catch-phrase of the defence lawyers, rather than a real rule of law. Anyone with any brains knows its simply doubt over proof of guilt. You can still walk away with a "not guilty" ruling and be the one who did it (and even have everyone know you did it).

"Innocent until proven guilty" just opens our government and legal system up to a million cases of compensation for incorrect incarceration.
 
Messages
400
Reaction score
302
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
a.c.e

a.c.e

1st Grade Fringe
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
400
Reaction score
302
Soooooooooooooooooooooo hes innocent? Acquitted of all charges? Free man? Sign him up! Put him on a short leash (1yr) minimum money so he can work his way to a bigger contract. Throw in some incentives if hes a good boy on and off the field. Its win win really. Put him in either centre or wing. Should be some fun times when he breaks that first tackle.
 
Messages
781
Reaction score
234
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Lego_Man

Lego_Man

Illuminatus
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
781
Reaction score
234
In Scotland they have 3 verdicts available for juries: "Guilty", "Not Guilty", and "Not Proven".

Something tells me that under that system Ewen Macdonald probably would have ended up with a "Not Proven."
 
Messages
7,787
Reaction score
7,242
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Lord Gnome of Howick MBE

Lord Gnome of Howick MBE

Warriors 1st Grader
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
7,787
Reaction score
7,242
In Scotland they have 3 verdicts available for juries: "Guilty", "Not Guilty", and "Not Proven".

Something tells me that under that system Ewen Macdonald probably would have ended up with a "Not Proven."
Yes, but they also have a wife-beating competition in the highland games and eat deep-fried dog turds up there.
 
Top Bottom