I love what this implies - that Jordan knew players would figure out how to deal with his dribbling and slam dunking, so he
had to come up with something else. Obviously every player is going to be better at A rather than B, but you don't want the team to suffer because the opposition have got
Johnson/whoever tied up so they can't run and their kicking game is just piss poor. Basically, some parts of a players game are going to be 90% good,
no parts of that players game should be less than 65-70%.
If I'm Warriors coach I'm going to spend a hell of a lot of time on two things: Defence and Attacking so you get the ball back. Fix the Defence and we get a lot more energy to attack. The attack, yeah,
Johnson's already doing good at forcing some dropouts according to the stats but my point is that forcing dropouts is a byproduct of being patient in attack. You attack in the first set aiming to force a dropout and - obviously if the opportunity presents itself you go for it
but still knowing that the dropout needs to be acheived so knowing when to just tip it into the ingoal - same with the second set and eventually the defence are too stuffed to make another bloody tackle. Then the door suddenly opens and
that is when the razzle dazzle stuff really kicks in. I accept giving the ball the opposition in their 10m but obviously then the defence really needs to stand up.
I guess what I'm saying is that when I'm coach the first 20-30 minutes are going to be the Warriors forcing the opposition to make lots of tackles and making their tackles on the opposition and not getting the reward for it points-wise. That comes later in the game.
Eric, you got my number, yeah? I'm free anytime you want to talk.