Ryno_old
Guest
I definitely disagree. I'd say Inu's average game has been the bench mark as our best back.
Hmm maybe I should reword.
IMO Inu has a lot of upside and a lot of downside. One minute he looks like an absolute freak and the next he's having a huge brain meltdown, and the one thing that seems rather consistent with him is that he isnt 'switched on' for the whole 80 minutes. This is the reason I believe he has been dropped from the top side and Tupou has been the preferred option.
Tupou is a good young developing player who does the basics well, gives it for 80 minutes, chases on kicks and is really eager to impress.
So IMO regarding the Tupou vs Inu debate, I think we have enough attacking flair in the team with out Inu, so I can see the reasoning in behind picking Tupou.
Last edited by a moderator: